• Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Tech companies are expected to be run at a loss for quite some time before they start being profitable.

    They were founded in 2015 and “officially” launched GPT in 2022 to the public. If they make profits by 2032, that would be in line with how other tech companies established themselves.

    For example, Spotify wasn’t profitable until 2024. They launched in 2008.

    So, I don’t know why them not being profitable is what everyone is talking about. They’re not expected to be profitable until 2030 at the earliest. And every serious investor know this.

    Yes I’m very fun at parties. But it seems that a lot of people just do not understand the expected timelines of tech companies.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      Okay but the world had enough money to bankroll Spotify for 20 years. It doesn’t have the kind of money OpenAI needs.

  • ExtraJudgement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Proprietary frontier LLMs in companies riddled with highly suspect business practices.

    My local LLM setup has absolutely been making the equivalence of positive cashflow for me since gemma 4 and qwen 3.8: I need less total time for several groups of annoying (but necessary) tasks, which means my productivity is up and I can use the rest as my own free time.

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I need less total time for several groups of annoying (but necessary) tasks

      Such as? Just curious what people use LLMs for.

      • antiR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I handle so many text files in my job and LLMs help make the scripts for me to handle these text files. I know it is important to at least know stuff like regex but I am not a superhuman. It is difficult for me to heavily specialize in scripting while also specialize in the technicalities of my job. To help show why it is difficult to specialize scripting, I work with hardware description languages which have a different syntax from scripting languages. Handling different languages causes confusion on the proper syntax even with a basic if else statement because the syntax is different between languages.

        Aside from this, it can also help me automate describing what the sequences I created in the file for easy documentation. I just have to instruct the “patterns” it needs to look for. I just need to proofread the output and do minor fixes.

    • Jumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      But isn’t OpenAI just burning billions of moneys already? In that case Winamp is already more profitable

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    1 day ago

    Your local grocery store is more profitable than OpenAI. In fact you are more profitable than OpenAI.

    OpenAI owes hundreds of billions of dollars, with a revenue a fraction of that. They will never become profitable.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They will never become profitable.

      If you look at OpenAI as a single, independent, private company then they appear unprofitable. But when you look at them as a means of laundering Pentagon money and other federal contracts into straw purchases for NVIDIA and Oracle, they are immensely profitable.

      AI is a Loss Leader. It props up the production and sale of hardware, which has been fruitful for its partners, its investors, and the economy as a whole. It is a digital form of induced demand in so far as new construction creates a “virtuous” cycle of increasing consumption, as more and more of the business and public sector is dragged into its orbit.

      The end-game for OpenAI is to have a captured market of businesses and government institutions. Whole sectors of the economy devoid of human knowledge workers who are hopelessly addicted to AI Agent processes, because nobody managing the companies actually know what these agents are doing anymore. At this point, Altman and Amodei can charge whatever they damned well please for token traffic, because there’s no bureaucracy capable of competing with them.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Most of the money getting funneled to Nvidia came from them in the first place. That’s why they’re one of the chatbot’s biggest cheerleaders.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Most of the money getting funneled to Nvidia came from them in the first place.

          NVIDIA’s not getting most of its money from OpenAI. OpenAI doesn’t really buy anything from NVIDIA. They buy rack space from Oracle, which then builds out new datacenters with NVIDIA chipsets. And Oracle’s primary revenue stream is from its business Cloud Services, of which OpenAI is a small fraction.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Keeping foreign technology out of the reach of US consumers has been a big part of Trump/Biden/Trump-Era tech policy.

          And as hardware prices skyrocket, access to compute approaches a monopoly position.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 day ago

          I like that they never lost their gusto with the designs of the bills lol

          Like they had to know that their currency was basically dead, yet they still made sure that those 100 billion Mark notes looked classy as fuck.

          If/when the modern US makes it to this point, I can’t imagine them putting all that much effort into making our $100 billion dollar bills look cool.

          They’ll probably have fucking Steve Bannon’s face on them.

          • StillAlive@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Like they had to know that their currency was basically dead, yet they still made sure that those 100 billion Mark notes looked classy as fuck.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 day ago

            The person designing them had to make them pretty because they knew they were going to be paid in them

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, you joke. But Germany pivoted out of the Great Depression far faster than its European peers precisely because they weren’t afraid to print a bunch of money and pay people to do things.

        The Fascists inherited one of the only recovering economies in Europe by the time they took power in 1932. And when they assumed office, they brought investment from the Americans overseas (who were having their own fascist turn), because they were willing to purge or enslave local populations, tear down neighborhoods, and build up whatever capital Standard Oil, IBM, and Ford Motor Company asked of them.

        On the opposite side of the Atlantic and on the other side of the Urals, progressive liberals and Soviet communists were trying out a leftist mirror of this strategy. They were using the levers of the state to mobilize the masses of unemployed labor into productive capital improvements for the benefit of the public at-large. So the US, Germany, Japan, and the USSR all rapidly emerged out of the '29 crash into a booming 1930s economy. Meanwhile, England and France and much of Latin America and North Africa languished under artificial constraints of state-capitalism.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I mean, we’ll jump to 1930s on reflex. But this is a pattern that’s repeated itself internationally, from Apartheid South Africa to the juntas in the Pacific Rim to Fascists in Argentina and Chile.

            Economy shits itself. Social Democrats come in to deliver milquetoast reforms. The economy recovers somewhat, but never enough to actually relieve the social pressures of the moment. And then the democratic system starts vomiting up radical candidates of all stripes, while bourgeois capital attempts to ride the tiger into the next full recovery and/or national emergency.

            The wheel of fortune doesn’t always land on Fascism. But it’s definitely a possibility.

            • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              History doesn’t repeat, but it rhymes.

              It seems like we’re plunging into fascism, but maybe this upcoming midterms will (not be rigged and) prove to be an effective backlash to the US’ reactionary coup. What do you figure the odds are we pull out of this and say, “huh actually let’s try that FDR thing instead of this Nazi shit”?

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        See, you’d think people would do more research when lending billions for LLMs than when lending a dollar for a cardboard box.

        • trebach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They’re hoping it pays off in the long run, or at least long enough for them to go public and sell their shares at a profit while pension funds and mutual funds buy a crashing asset.

        • you won’t generate a 1,000x return on investment, AI could if it becomes AGI somehow. It’s like gambling but nobody knows the odds and the payout is big enough that it’s almost worth it to try without knowing the odds.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            I’ve been familiar with the Singularity for a long time now and this “recent” perspective by AI investors bewilders me. There’s no profit to be had there - you can’t enslave a god. 💀

  • affenlehrer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I like LLMs and also the research but I think we’re at a point where one could make a pause, turn the models into silicon and sell them as hardware for people who are actually interested.

    That would solve all privacy problems, eliminate many data centers, subscription fees, internet dependencies and allow for slower and more thoughtful upgrades (hardware isn’t updated as often as software). That would be a pretty sovereign solution.

    However, from a company perspective they can’t force it on everyone anymore, don’t get all the juicy data from all the users and can’t sell subscriptions any more and change everything on their side.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      turn the models into silicone

      The models are data, and silicone is rubber. So… I don’t know what you’re proposing here.

      • affenlehrer@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Fixed it. We don’t use this silly silicon word here. I picked the wrong one. We call it Silicium Sodium is Natrium, Potassium is Kalium, Aluminum is Aluminum etc.

      • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I believe he is suggesting we turn them into very large breasts, or in some cases big booties, depending on your preference and what part of the world you’re in.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Even with “silicon” doesn’t really make sense. The models already live on silicon, they’re stored in the datacenters needed to run them. It’s not like you can make them into some chip and magically not have to use the datacenter.

          • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Gonna take GPS example to explain general processors vs specific ones.

            GPS works by doing some simple math around triangulation from satalites. When they first came out there were no GPS chips. It was done by a general processors.

            Now they can do it, but because they can do Amy Hong they’re not as fast as newer GPS chips.

            How they work is the silicon can only handle the GPS calculations. But because of that, it can do it way faster.

            LLMs run on matrix math and probabilities. We can 100% come up with specialised silicon to handle this math. Intact, thats what a lot of AI specialised chips are.

            • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              NPUs are already a thing, specialized cpus for nerual networks. The problem is the models are just databases, and you need lots of fast memory in order to feed the NPUs data, and thats the current bottleneck.

            • trebach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              They aren’t comparable. GPS is deterministic and simple so as you said it could be reduced to an FPGA or ASIC.

              LLMs are partially matrix math and probabilities but they’re also more complex than that and require a large amount of RAM to run even the first time. Each query added to the context increases the RAM needed further.

              • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                48 minutes ago

                I dont believe the memory, both ram and storage combine, are what’s causing data centres to gobble up power and associated resources (electricity, cooling,…).

                Its the GPUs.

                I’m not counting on a future with LLMs by any means, but there’s tons of efficiencies we can do to make the cost go down. Were just not doing it.

                We saw the same thing with crypto mining. It started on GPUs but then speficially designed silicon (asyc miners) were vastly more efficient than a GPU rig.

                It still needed memory yes, but again, thats not the constraint.

                • trebach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  They’re actually not because they have randomness built in. Since we are working with probabilities, it won’t always pick the next token that has the highest probability and the randomness can be tuned via a “temperature” setting to make it more or less likely that it will choose the most probable token.

                  The weights for the model could be stored in a firmware chip but you still need RAM because it pulls all the weights into RAM in order to perform the calculations.

  • m532@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Capitalists: Noo its bad, see, it doesn’t make profit

    Communists: Free AI for everyone

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I remember once my father and I were walking down Fifth Avenue and there was a homeless person sitting right outside of Trump Tower and I remember my father pointing to him and saying, ‘You know, that guy has $8 billion more than me,’ because he was in such extreme debt at that point, you know?”

    ~ Ivanka Trump

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 hours ago

    They’ll reclassify it as a necessary utility like water or power and tax more subsidies for paying billionaires even more from public coffers before admitting it’s mostly just search engines & corporate social media eating their own tail.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      This is why I think the bubble will last a lot longer than some people think. The heads of the tech firms have such a tight relationship with the GOP, and even a somewhat tight relationship with the Democrats that it’s almost certainly going to be declared “too big to fail” or “too critical to fail”.

      The fact that it’s being used by the military just makes that even more likely. The firms will declare that if they go bankrupt, the military will be crippled – despite the fact that the military ran just fine without “AI” just 5 years ago.

      So, when the economics of the situation show how absurd this bubble is, the collapse won’t happen because the firms will be propped up by the US government. That will put every taxpayer on the hook for the billions and billions of debt these firms took on. So, Andreessen Horowitz and the Saudis will be bailed out by the taxpayers who have been fighting datacenters.

      • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Chatbot labs don’t employee enough people for too big to fail to be a concern. There isn’t enough currency in existence to make them profitable.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was finally starting to save up money in a 401k for retirement. Then I got fired. Now the AI bubble is going to burst and nuke what little money is in my 401k. FML.

  • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Waiter, please bring me 1,000 of your finest shares of WinRAR! I’m going to be rich, I tell you! Quite!

  • raven55six@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    That is so true, bringing $40 Billion a year with about $80 Billion as expenses makes OpenAI indeed in a red zone. They should consider shutting down so that we can have some level of relief from AI slop.

      • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        From who? Not really an option. If OpenAI can’t pay it’s bills in 2027-28, it will end Oracle & Softbank.

        Softbank is so over-leveraged, it should be illegal.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They’ll pay off the old loans with new loans disguised as investments between all the major AI players.

          • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            LLMs aren’t important & don’t employee many people. There is also no amount of free money that can make them profitable. I will happily bet you money right now this doesn’t happen before OpenAI and/or Anthropic are sold for scrap.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The government will buy a stake to both pay billionaires more from collected taxes and control what information can be generated and making the spy apparatus backdoors tracking every question or command part of the official platforms.

      • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’ll bet you $$$ right now that won’t happen. First of all, they still won’t be profitable. Second of all it’s easy to just completely avoid interacting with LLMs.

        • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          it’s easy to just completely avoid interacting with LLMs.

          I wish that were true. Have you seen reddit lately? Lemmy isn’t immune but I haven’t encountered any obvious bot posts here yet.