Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10か月前Can I have a rule?files.catbox.moeimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1206arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1199arrow-down1imageCan I have a rule?files.catbox.moeRozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10か月前message-square7fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresircac@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10か月前There is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…
minus-squareQuentinQuiver@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10か月前Only science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
minus-squareQuentinQuiver@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10か月前The “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true. Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.
There is no hope to be effectively saved by an unsourced saviour, specially during apocalypse…
Only science needs sources. Maths doesn’t
The “source” is internally consistent statistical reasoning and moral philosophy. When explained well enough, it should obviously be true.
Explaining it properly is easier said than done, though.