PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoWerewolf nudity rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up164arrow-down10
arrow-up164arrow-down1imageWerewolf nudity rulelemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareTheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoIf there were complaints, it makes one wonder if the model is anatomically correct and fully functional.
minus-squareAlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoDisplay mannequins in clothing stores get guest complaints if they’re naked, they’re not even anatomically correct there’s just a bump for the naughty bits on the male ones!
minus-squareArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days ago anatomically correct Well I suppose if a movie was intended to be very realistic, then… fully functional What!?
minus-squaresmokin_shinobi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoThey weren’t in the movie at least.
If there were complaints, it makes one wonder if the model is anatomically correct and fully functional.
Display mannequins in clothing stores get guest complaints if they’re naked, they’re not even anatomically correct there’s just a bump for the naughty bits on the male ones!
Well I suppose if a movie was intended to be very realistic, then…
What!?
They weren’t in the movie at least.