Hellfire103@lemmy.ca to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前It's that simplelemmy.caimagemessage-square275fedilinkarrow-up11.71Karrow-down144
arrow-up11.66Karrow-down1imageIt's that simplelemmy.caHellfire103@lemmy.ca to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square275fedilink
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 年前If Windows doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses
minus-squareAlaknár@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Sure, mate. 128 GB of RAM is clearly “for the masses”. :D To quote the classic: “the best thing about Linux is the community. The worst thing about Linux is the community”.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前Did you even read what I said? If Windows needs more than 128gb of ram then it’s not for the masses because the masses have less than that
minus-squareAlaknár@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前What are you trying to argue here, mate? We’re talking about OSes for the average user. You said that Windows with 128 GB is “not stable and not ready out of the box, unlike Linux”. Then you said “if it doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses”. So what exactly is your point?
If Windows doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses
Sure, mate. 128 GB of RAM is clearly “for the masses”. :D
To quote the classic: “the best thing about Linux is the community. The worst thing about Linux is the community”.
Did you even read what I said?
If Windows needs more than 128gb of ram then it’s not for the masses because the masses have less than that
What are you trying to argue here, mate?
We’re talking about OSes for the average user. You said that Windows with 128 GB is “not stable and not ready out of the box, unlike Linux”.
Then you said “if it doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses”.
So what exactly is your point?
You just said it
Are you OK, buddy?