0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 年前Yeah yeah, we know you're speciallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down130
arrow-up11.01Karrow-down1imageYeah yeah, we know you're speciallemmy.dbzer0.com0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square143fedilink
minus-squareMalix@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·2 年前Different bus, different naming. Now, memory kinda hazy, but weren’t ide devices /dev/hdX?
minus-square0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 年前Yeah, they used to be, but they switched a few years back to consistently call all block devices sdx.
minus-squareMalix@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前srsly? so it’s just all “grab whatever dev” and not at all associated with the bus?
minus-squaremark3748@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 年前ATA was rolled into the SCSI subsystem, so both sata and pata are covered by SDX.
minus-square0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前Makes sense, I mean… they’re all essentialy long term memory storage devices.
Different bus, different naming.
Now, memory kinda hazy, but weren’t ide devices /dev/hdX?
Yeah, they used to be, but they switched a few years back to consistently call all block devices sdx.
srsly? so it’s just all “grab whatever dev” and not at all associated with the bus?
ATA was rolled into the SCSI subsystem, so both sata and pata are covered by SDX.
Makes sense, I mean… they’re all essentialy long term memory storage devices.