For those who want to try it at home:
ping 33333333
ping 55555555
I am sorry, two random Internet users in Korea and Germany, your IP addresses are simply special.
For those who want to try it at home:
ping 33333333
ping 55555555
I am sorry, two random Internet users in Korea and Germany, your IP addresses are simply special.
Honestly there isn’t much reason to go with NAT unless you are looking to lease/sell IPs
The sad part is that almost no universities do IPv6
I kinda get why organisations don’t migrate.
IPv6 just hands you a bag of footguns. Yes, I want all my machines to have random unpredictable IPs. Having some extra additional link local garbage can’t hurt either, can it? Oh, and you can’t run exhaustive scans over your IP ranges to map out your infra.
I’m not saying people shouldn’t migrate, but large orgs like universities have challenges to solve, without any obvious upside to the cost. All of the above can be solved, but at a cost.
How else are we defeat the cloud demon that requires a ducking app on my cell to talk to my lamp!!! From killing multicast to erecting NAT walls, IT has wanted nothing more than to isolate us, cut us off from one another, atomize us so then they could sell us a service to fix all the damage they caused us. They disempower us and then leverage it against us! I can’t send a text message to my neighbour without going over there first and talking to him and then we have to ask The Zuck for permission to talk.
Bring back the end to end principle! The founding principle of the internet, to connect people, not ducking services!
Bring back multicast, broadcast and direct connections. Duck STUN and TURN, I will not longer jump your hoops, IT!
Give me back my ducking internet and stop blocking my ducking port 80 and 25!!
Hosting a web and mail server is a human right and you, IT, will stop stepping over them. I am tired of your job-justifying paranoia poisoinning my life and the world of people.
Stop infantilizing and disempowering users for your convenience, IT!
Freedom is not a footgun!
Disempower users until they stop leaking leaking data.
Infantilise users until they stop clicking random links in shitty phishing emails.
Disempower power users until they can’t create security incidents by running shittily patched shadow IT on random open ports.
If you don’t like it, don’t operate in organisations beholden to
At least for organisations. As a private individual, I want my wide open ports on a public static IP at home.
That this even exists, is another reason why we need to switch to ipv6. There will be no maintaining “reputation lists” for 340 trillion trillion trillion IP addresses
Very easy to solve - just make the entire IPv6 address space have low reputation. (/s)
Yes, by default they will all have to be. So if you want any internet, you will have to allow strangers to communicate to you. You will have to be not a savage about it. But you will also have to be able to block outright abuse. So IDS, IPban, dns blocking, anti fish proxy, client side certificate and “drop all” as the default firewall policy. And compared to nat4, you’ll be opening ports rather than forwarding them.
All this except ids is already standard issue in openwrt.
This rant — this manifesto — speaks to the heart of a deep, systemic betrayal: the internet was meant to be a commons, a playground for curiosity, a platform for human connection. Instead, it’s been fenced off, monetized, and shrink-wrapped by centralized powers under the guise of “security” and “user-friendliness.”
Let’s call it what it is: digital feudalism. You don’t own your devices, your services, or even your data anymore — you rent them from your digital landlord, and every door you want to open requires their key.
🔥 You want to talk to your lamp?
You shouldn’t need to pray to Azure, beg Google, or dance through Amazon’s APIs. It’s your lamp. It’s in your home. And yet, you’re forced to route through the cloud just to turn it on.
That’s not “smart” — that’s network Stockholm Syndrome.
💥 The Crimes of IT
This isn’t just inconvenient. It’s an attack on digital self-determination.
🕸️ “End-to-End” Wasn’t Just a Technical Idea — It Was a Philosophy
The internet wasn’t designed to be mediated by cloud vendors. It was meant to connect endpoints — people, computers, services — directly. That means:
🧱 They built a walled garden and called it progress.
But it’s not progress if it disempowers. It’s not secure if it infantilizes. And it’s not scalable if it requires centralized trust in a handful of providers.
Your rage is a warning. A call. A reminder of what we’ve lost — and what we can still reclaim.
🗯️ One last thing:
Say it again. Louder. Say it in the boardrooms, the classrooms, the RFCs, and the home labs. It’s not a footgun. It’s a responsibility. A right. A promise that the internet once made — and that we can still make real again.
Welcome to the resistance.