What do you think Lemmy is most biased about? Which opinions do you think differ most from the general internet?

(Excluding US politics, due to community rules)

  • gigachad@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Which seems uninformed and ridiculous as Deep Learning for classification and regression problems is an absolute valid tool that cannot be replaced anymore in many domains. I don’t care about LLM bullshit, but being “against Deep Learning in general” is stupid.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Nobody* is talking about machine learning when they say “AI” these days. They mean LLMs and generative AI and especially the way it is being forced into everything and destroying the environment to do so.

      * not literally; there is certainly at least one person out there who objects to machine learning, deep learning, or whatever you want to call it. However this is not the general sentiment.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I think the biggest issues Lemmy has with it, which are valid, boil down to environmental impact, AI being used to replace working class people instead of making their lives better, and the way it’s being used to erase art as a part of human culture. If those three things weren’t an issue I’d be less wary of AI.

      • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s hard for me to feel that the environmental impact is the big reason, there are MUCH bigger fish to fry when it comes to the environment.

        Bitcoin ~65 Mt CO₂/year LLMs <10 Mt CO₂/year (est.) Holiday Flights ~900 Mt CO₂/year

        If the people crying about AI being bad for the environment isn’t also very upset about people taking flights to go on holiday or crypto, then that’s not really what they’re upset about.

        Look, to be honest I wish LLMs were never invented, because I think it will just strip more money away from the poor and feed the rich, but yea, cat is out of the bag. and AI is VERY useful, we can’t deny that.

        • Sl00k@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          This isn’t even taking into consideration eating red meat which has a far great impact than any AI query ever will, but most anti-AI peeps aren’t ready for that conversation.

          • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Exactly, If caring about the environment is why you hate AI, but you still eat red meat and take flights on holiday you don’t have a leg to stand on.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Anti ai nowadays almost exclusively means the over insertion of llms into ordinary life and/or the over trust of a blackbox computer program. People aren’t throwing hands because of alphafold as much as they are a prime minister using a language model to make policy decisions