Not OP. I think it’s funny how you’re accusing them of “bullying” when their comments aren’t aggressive at all, just pointing out a practice they disagree with. But somehow your multi-paragraph, raging, sorry, uh… “laughing” comment filled with direct insults and patronizing dismissal, should NOT be considered “bullying.”
Like, I don’t buy into the idea that anyone can bully someone else in an anonymous Internet forum, outside of doxxing or repeated harassment. But looking at this, one of you is clearly much more aggressive and bothered than the other here.
Using exaggerated, inaccurate, and sexually violent language, “fisting up to the elbow”, and accusing anyone who doesn’t agree with them of supporting the exaggeration IS bullying. It’s attempting to bludgeon anyone who doesn’t agree with their self-absolving moral superiority into submission.
I compared one type of extremist to other types of extremists. They are the same in that they all have a pathological belief that they are superior and that the self-absolution that comes with that pathological belief justified anything they do to people they feel are inferior.
An extremist is an extremist. They all believed that they are superior and they all believe that that superiority justifies anything that they do to people who don’t agree with them.
Not OP. I think it’s funny how you’re accusing them of “bullying” when their comments aren’t aggressive at all, just pointing out a practice they disagree with. But somehow your multi-paragraph,
raging, sorry, uh… “laughing” comment filled with direct insults and patronizing dismissal, should NOT be considered “bullying.”Like, I don’t buy into the idea that anyone can bully someone else in an anonymous Internet forum, outside of doxxing or repeated harassment. But looking at this, one of you is clearly much more aggressive and bothered than the other here.
Using exaggerated, inaccurate, and sexually violent language, “fisting up to the elbow”, and accusing anyone who doesn’t agree with them of supporting the exaggeration IS bullying. It’s attempting to bludgeon anyone who doesn’t agree with their self-absolving moral superiority into submission.
It’s laughable.
You compared religious extremists to vegans. YOU are laughable.
I compared one type of extremist to other types of extremists. They are the same in that they all have a pathological belief that they are superior and that the self-absolution that comes with that pathological belief justified anything they do to people they feel are inferior.
The pathology and wrong thought are the same.
One is imaginary, the other has scientific fact. No similarities there, and the rest is you imagining how people think.
Get help with your hateful delusions.
To be honest, I’m not sure which group of extremists you are an apologist for.
I mean, we all know that there are religious extremists so I assume you’re trying to deny the existence of vegan extremists who harass and attempt to intimidate business owners into complying with their demands and harass and intimidate their patrons.
An extremist is an extremist. They all believed that they are superior and they all believe that that superiority justifies anything that they do to people who don’t agree with them.
Same same.
Soo, you’re a meat eating extremist then? You’re here arguing for it? Same same.
Point to where I argued for eating meat. Go ahead and quote where I said anything about eating meat either way.
I didn’t state a position either way. All I said was that all extremists are the same. They all have the same thought pathology.
“All extremists are the same” another extreme view. You know you are arguing for meat by calling people who don’t eat meat extremists.
Also quick reminder what thread we are in. It’s not a good look for you chicken fuckers.