Whether big or small. We all have that one thing from Scifi we wished were real. I’d love to see a cool underground city with like a SkyDome or a space hotel for instance.

  • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sure, but have you considered that this would loosen the hold capitalism has on the wage slaves? Won’t someone think of the shareholders‽

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      At best it would prop up capitalism until we can replace it with something better.

      It’s literally just giving people more money to shove into the capitalist system. You don’t change a system by feeding it.

      I won’t say it’s a bad thing… but it’s not a solution. It’s a stop gap.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        UBI will be necessary when the combination of AI and robotics creates a permanent 35+% unemployment rate. We will have to institute UBI, or reduce the population by that much. Which objective will each party choose to support, and how will they accomplish it?

        • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Which objective will each party choose to support, and how will they accomplish it?

          One leading party often seems willing to accept war as a means to ends they care about.

          In a total lack of contrast, the other leading party seems roughly equally willing to accept war as a means to ends they care about.

          The bigger question that bothers me is how much war exactly will they feel is needed for any population reduction they feel is necessary?

          And will it be more war than the amount of war I would have otherwise participated in, in my lifetime?

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            War is a useful tool to reduce populations, but fairly inefficient until they start throwing bombs around. It can’t be the only strategy.

            Another good strategy is to restrict access to medical care. Make it incredibly expensive, so costly that many people will choose to die, rather then burden their families with the cost.

            Another good one is to end childhood vaccines. A good pandemic can wipe out millions. Of course, this is only happening in America, so the wealthy will be able to afford vaccines from foreign countries, and survive any strategic pandemics. I wouldn’t be surprised if Stephen “PeeWee Himmler” Miller released a deadly virus on purpose, something like Ebola, just to speed the process along.

            Then there is Climate Change, which is wreaking havoc on our environment, and causing far worst storms and floods. Restrict or even end FEMA, and our annual natural disasters can claim victims with much more efficiency.

            Criminalize EVERYTHING, and throw more people in prison, where the mortality rate is much higher. Allow the military/ law enforcement to fire on protesters. Allow police to kill without consequences.

            Prohibit Birthright Citizenship, allowing the deportation of millions of American citizens. Don Jr, Ivanka, and Eric are all Birthright Citizens, so they should be deported as well, but we all know that Aristocrats won’t be included.

            And if doing all this, and more, doesn’t reduce the population fast enough, we can always go down the proven path of Death Camps.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s probably a necessary step towards dismantling the monetary system entirely, though.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Is there a specific mention of that, or just something people assume? I googled a single reddit thread, which clearly makes me an expert (/s), and it seemed as though money was really just kind of a fuzzy concept up until they declared they didn’t use money sometime around Star Trek 4.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I do remember them specifically saying that their economic system was completely changed by Replicator technology, although I don’t remember who said it, or in what context. I don’t even remember which show. I’m pretty sure I heard it correctly, because I remember it being a massive revelation to me. That was the single event that completely shifted all humanity away from a capitalist society.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly, what are those useless sociopaths supposed to be doing now? Actual labor? Come on…!