Whether big or small. We all have that one thing from Scifi we wished were real. I’d love to see a cool underground city with like a SkyDome or a space hotel for instance.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    I don’t forking understand why in 2025, taking pills is still the only way for me to get better for some illness. As someone who gets pretty bad anxiety about taking pills and who sometimes almost chokes on them, I seriously can’t understand how we have pocket PCs but we don’t have a way to just treat things without pills. Hell, I’ll drink something that tastes horrible if it means I don’t gotta test my gag reflex.

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This whole thread is just Americans saying things that they don’t have that is common elsewhere. And that isn’t answering the question at all. It’s the ever present thing of 'Murican idiocy thinking only about the US and acting like anything else doesn’t exist.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Hemp as a replacement for plastics and synthetic materials. Food packaging shouldn’t have a longer shelf life than it’s contents.

    Sunchips was using PLA, which is a step in the rougher direction.

  • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    AR. Being able to just pop into someone’s AR world and walk around as if I was in tge same physical location.

    Bikes/Ebikes/motorcycles replacing cars for single-person transport in cities.

    • astanix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      As long as shareholder value is the number one thing it just cant happen.

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        17 hours ago

        OP says, “with our current current level of technology.”

        We have the technology to overcome any logistics issue pertaining to eliminating scarcity (and by extension, poverty). What we lack is the societal structure.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          This is what frustrates me because in theory yes, you’re right. But in reality those shareholders are not who you think they are. Many of them are your relatives through 401k and RRSP managed funds.

          What I’m getting at is it would be great to Luigi a bunch of billionaires but the reality is the problem is systemic and no amount of murder is going to solve that.

          We go back to the Levellers and the Diggers. My gut tells me we are going to everyone screaming for change ultimately get what they want which is someone will be beheaded but then in the aftermath you all have no fucking plan and guess what? In a few years we are going to be right back here again.

          I hope I’m wrong, but history has a way of repeating the same beats over and over again.

  • arararagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I never stopped dreaming about flying cars, I just think it’s not gonna happen because a crash would easily kill people just sitting in their homes.

    • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Helicopters exist, they are expensive, loud, require pilot training and skill, and still crash sometimes.

    • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Compared to aviation, road vehicles have virtually no structured regulations.

      Even road rules are considered optional by many drivers. Lots of people drive without a licence.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Here is something we don’t have that I think we could: Automated vegetable farming.

    I’ve seen these watering gantries that are fixed at the center of a circular field and then rotate radially around that point to water the field. Could you use that as a rail with an effector arm on it that can plant, weed, tend, fertilize and harvest the field, such that in goes seeds and out comes vegetables? Without the liability of free roaming robotic tractors and combine harvesters. Surely the issue here would be software.

    • stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m into hydroponics as a hobby grower and there are certain techniques for veggie growing that are set and forget. You plant and harvest only, no weeding, no watering. As far as I understand, traditional techniques are still cheaper though

    • Yaky@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Those are called pivots, and what you are saying seems plausible: there are vision algorithms to recognize and selectively spray weeds (see Bilberry ), recent prototypes with light-pressure grabbers to gather fruits and soft vegetables.

      Even for harvesters, there are projects to automate harvesting and swapping the grain trucks (see Outrun ). GPS-guided (or assisted) tractors are already a thing.

      Agriculture has some interesting innovations, but it often gets bogged down in corporate acquisitions and monetization.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve seen a project for adapting Reprap 3D printer technology to a raised bed garden, with a multi-function tool head that can individually plant seeds, it weeds by poking weeds deep into the soil, it waters individual plants according to that plant’s need…so I thought why not scale that up to multiple acres in size?

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m on board with ethical and opt-in telemetry. Knowing how your users interact with your app is very useful, but not many companies can show restraint when money is involved.

      • Aeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If my data was used to refine and improve the products and services I interact with I’d be fine with it but as it stands it’s just used to help make my life hell and exploit my existence for cash.

      • weirdbeardgame@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        100% this. Telemetry and market research are fine. Hell Some opt in, totally 100% disableable targeted ads are fine as long as they’re not excessive and in the way. Flagrant selling of info however, does not spark joy.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I can see replacing cash with transfers but not removing currency entirely, but that’s my POV. What would you replace it with instead?

      • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        What would you replace it with instead?

        Nothing. Humanity as a whole would have to evolve past the carrot and stick mentality for this to work. That’s why I said it probably won’t happen 😅

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Plants on buildings bring some architectural and safety challenges, depending on how large they are. You need to somehow get dirt and water up, and the dirt can be pretty heavy. If something falls down into the ground it could hit someone and injured them. And also, with time, roots could lessen the structural integrity of a building.