• fuckgod@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tbf, “unalive” is only a thing because of TikTok, unless they’re pushing the same content to both platforms, when they have to go with the most restrictive version of their combined rules.

    And even then most of the problem is keeping it monetized, not necessarily the platforms during it down directly.

    But since videos are a career now, it’s a fairly effective ban on certain words.

    TikTok is way way waaaay too picky imo. Personally I don’t want anything censored at all, for any reason.

    Unless someone is going ham on a topic that’s triggers you into some PTSD situation, I don’t really think there’s a good argument for censorship to exist in any form at all.

    If some idiot is using language you don’t like you just stop listening to them and realize that when you’re scrolling through an non-curated source of content, you will hear idiots saying stupid shit.

    But the action taken on them shouldn’t be an effective gag, it should be just getting ignored. Once blocked and ignored enough, it’s basically a shadow ban. It wouldn’t be profitable for them to be offensive just for the sake of being offensive, but they shouldn’t be getting what basically amounts to fines just because they said someone "died"or got “killed”.

    That kinda shit is bonkers.

    • Dale@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      “Unalive” and others on tiktok aren’t even enforced. People believe that the algorithm will like it better if they do it but there are tons of very popular videos with cursing and “killed.” I think it’s the viewers swiping away (affecting the algorithm) and the creators voluntarily censoring themselves that created this.

      • fuckgod@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve never been on TikTok, but I’ve heard creators that do both mention that doing so is because of TikTok rules.

        Fuck censors.

    • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You’re welcome to host such a platform. Won’t be easy to keep it running without funding though.

      • TheSilenceNoise@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I completely disagree with this line of thinking.

        Rather than hindering or censoring entire platforms because “kids might see something undesirable” (which common sense shows they’ll get around to find no matter what anyways), I think the kids and parents should have and maintain their own monitored or restricted internet somewhere else.

        Instead, the majority of platforms get controlled and sanitized in the name of children while the issue is framed as an impossible problem to solve. It isn’t. Put your kids on the sanitized internet and let me have my swears or risqué topics please.

        Besides, none of this ever ends up being about kids anyways. It’s all about control and data collection.

      • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The other day I was walking past a gaggle of middle schoolers and heard them swearing like sailors, one even called the other a fag.

        They’re children, they’re going to say and do things they’re not supposed to do because they want to do the cool, bad, thing they’re not allowed to do

        I didn’t see any of the tiktok censorship stopping that conversation