Interesting. My political side is far from that of Charlie Kirk and still think that nobody deserves to be punished without a trial, let alone be murdered. Otherwise I fail to spot the difference between two different sides of hate.
Besides, man, that’s not a “based opinion”. That’s plainly bullshit. As I said elsewhere, if you really think the man deserved it, why didn’t do it yourself? Cowardice? Lazyness? Or maybe the truth is that you are just pretending to care about some cause?
At least, block is functional here. But I’ll happily report your comment first.
Interesting. My political side is far from that of Charlie Kirk and still think that nobody deserves to be punished without a trial, let alone be murdered. Otherwise I fail to spot the difference between two different sides of hate.
Besides, man, that’s not a “based opinion”. That’s plainly bullshit. As I said elsewhere, if you really think the man deserved it, why didn’t do it yourself? Cowardice? Lazyness? Or maybe the truth is that you are just pretending to care about some cause?
At least, block is functional here. But I’ll happily report your comment first.
He didn’t deserve it, but he was certainly fine with it.
This is reasonable.
We tried giving the Nazis trials before. It didn’t work, they’re still here.
Charlie Kirk was a christofascist Nazi, and it’s just a shame that it was over quickly, because he deserved to feel it.