• bigfondue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That is sort of the thing with Gnome. If you like it it’s great, but if you don’t there is nothing you can do to really change it. Like I think it’s okay, but there are things I don’t like and it is just too much effort to try to adapt it to my preferences.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You’re right. The several extensions I have used for years don’t exist because: meme. The many settings you can easily change in 2 minutes also fake. Meme.

            • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I’m sure that’s what they meant. That you literally cannot change a single setting in Gnome. What a good-faith interpretation.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Ah yes, the real good faith argument here is saying you can do nothing to customize GNOME because sometimes extensions break. Great point.

    • overload@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Good for you. I broke my GNOME Pop OS build, I assume because of extensions and pop not updating anything for 2 years. GNOME goes against the Linux philosophy of user customisation.

      • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They don’t develop GNOME for you, they develop GNOME for them

        They don’t earn more with more users

        • Zangoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If it’s only for them then they shouldn’t mind getting their Wayland protocol veto privilege taken away 🤷

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I used it for a while, because KDE was so buggy. Gnome gives you no functionality and it’s still buggy, though.

      Once KDE improved I switched to it, though

      • eneff@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I’ve been running native Wayland exclusively for ages. I disabled XWayland by running gnome-shell with the --no-x11 flag.

        What makes you think I wasn’t?

        • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          There are bugs in Gnome 49 using xwayland like caps lock and other keys not working. But if you don’t use x11 at all (and therefore applications relying on it) you won’t encounter them.