• idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s not wrong, it’s close enough. And the point it works with more numbers and more type of calculation. Let’s calculate 4% of 1243. That’s the same as 1243% of 4, right, much easier to calculate by simply changing the 2 numbers… While my method is the same, by simply rounding everything.

    And in engineering you always multiply/divide your results by a 1.5 or 1.25 safety factor, depending on situation. So you don’t have to calculate exact results, just close enough. E.g. G is always 10m/s2. π is only 3.14, the other digits doesn’t matter.

    • shrugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s the stupidest shit I have heard today. You should feel ashamed if you really are an engineer

      • Vegiforous@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s how engineering is. In civil you can round π=5 for a lot of calculations. In astrophysics I’ve seen e=π=10