But they are denying the current persecution of the uyghurs; denying the various historical atrocities like the holodomor, Tienanmen square, the katyn massacre, etc; excusing the ones they can’t deny; and simping for authoritarianism. Oh and lets not forget a decent contingent of them agree with nutomic that transness is bourgoise.
So what you’re saying is tankies should be violently persecuted for their words with no other provocation by people like me who disagree with them. Lucky for you, were we arguing IRL I wouldn’t get violent until you do, because I’m not a piece of shit. Enjoy it all you like, and I’ll judge you all I like.
Idek who the admin there is, but I’m also arguing with an .ml tankie, does that mean I’m supporting nutomic because his site is facilitating that? By interacting with the internet at all through companies like cloudflare, whatever device you use, your ISP, does that mean you support capitalism? Maybe you should self isolate from them yourself. By using a Mali TLD does that mean you support everything the Mali gov does including their arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings?
Probably not, you’re probably not dumb enough to actually believe that bullshit argument you put up, you just think I am. Nice try but no dice.
Too bad you can’t resort to violence because this is the internet and you have to use your words, I can see why you’re prone to violence if this is the limit of your argumentative prowess.
You were the one who said that you would cut contact or argue; If you’re going to get so bent out of shape about one person on one instance it raises the question why you’re not so outspoken about other instances you use where people express the same opinions.
Me, I’ve been plenty outspoken about Nutomic, I’ve said that if he ever posts on a comm I mod I’ll ban him myself.
You were the one who said that you would cut contact or argue;
cut contact or argue
argue
HOLY SHIT WHO PUT THAT THERE?! Oh me. Well good, then I can continue to argue without contradicting myself, phew.
Really thought that was your slam dunk? You’re really bad at this. If you were this SJW admin and we were talking about trans stuff, guess I’d still be arguing with you.
To translate it for you since you seem to be having issues differentiating violence from conversation, I was saying I’m not going to beat this admin up for saying shit I don’t agree with, instead I’ll either cut contact (as in not talk to them, walk away, or here “block”) or (like this) argue. You’ll notice I’m also not beating you up because we disagree on initiating violence. Probably because my whole argument is “that’s bad.”
I am not a fan of initiating violence either generally, but I still think it’s a funny copypasta because racist nerd gets bullied in it, who knows if it’s even true.
it’s good that you’re having fun but I don’t think you made yourself any more clear to me
I am not a fan of initiating violence either generally
Coulda fooled me. Seems to be you’re the one in this convo advocating for it, and as further evidence to that point you’re still literally incapable of even understanding my argument all these comments later despite me literally telling you that my argument is “initiating violence is bad.”
I’m gonna go with “nuh uh” on this one, I straight up do not believe you truthfully aren’t a “fan” of initiating violence after having spent this entire convo advocating and excusing exactly what you claim you’re not a fan of. Something tells me you enjoy it, not sure what, but I think it was you literally saying you enjoy it.
They’re not arguing for racism and capitalism to continue though but you can do what you like and I’ll continue to laugh at the copypasta
But they are denying the current persecution of the uyghurs; denying the various historical atrocities like the holodomor, Tienanmen square, the katyn massacre, etc; excusing the ones they can’t deny; and simping for authoritarianism. Oh and lets not forget a decent contingent of them agree with nutomic that transness is bourgoise.
So what you’re saying is tankies should be violently persecuted for their words with no other provocation by people like me who disagree with them. Lucky for you, were we arguing IRL I wouldn’t get violent until you do, because I’m not a piece of shit. Enjoy it all you like, and I’ll judge you all I like.
Denying things that are verifiably false is normal and good
you post on sh.itjust.works despite the admin there being transphobic, maybe you should self-isolate from there too.
subjective assessment
Idek who the admin there is, but I’m also arguing with an .ml tankie, does that mean I’m supporting nutomic because his site is facilitating that? By interacting with the internet at all through companies like cloudflare, whatever device you use, your ISP, does that mean you support capitalism? Maybe you should self isolate from them yourself. By using a Mali TLD does that mean you support everything the Mali gov does including their arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings?
Probably not, you’re probably not dumb enough to actually believe that bullshit argument you put up, you just think I am. Nice try but no dice.
Too bad you can’t resort to violence because this is the internet and you have to use your words, I can see why you’re prone to violence if this is the limit of your argumentative prowess.
I’m actually an anarchist tyvm
You were the one who said that you would cut contact or argue; If you’re going to get so bent out of shape about one person on one instance it raises the question why you’re not so outspoken about other instances you use where people express the same opinions.
Me, I’ve been plenty outspoken about Nutomic, I’ve said that if he ever posts on a comm I mod I’ll ban him myself.
Mmhmm I’ve heard that one before. If true, great.
HOLY SHIT WHO PUT THAT THERE?! Oh me. Well good, then I can continue to argue without contradicting myself, phew.
Really thought that was your slam dunk? You’re really bad at this. If you were this SJW admin and we were talking about trans stuff, guess I’d still be arguing with you.
To translate it for you since you seem to be having issues differentiating violence from conversation, I was saying I’m not going to beat this admin up for saying shit I don’t agree with, instead I’ll either cut contact (as in not talk to them, walk away, or here “block”) or (like this) argue. You’ll notice I’m also not beating you up because we disagree on initiating violence. Probably because my whole argument is “that’s bad.”
This fun for you? It is for me lol.
I am not a fan of initiating violence either generally, but I still think it’s a funny copypasta because racist nerd gets bullied in it, who knows if it’s even true.
it’s good that you’re having fun but I don’t think you made yourself any more clear to me
Coulda fooled me. Seems to be you’re the one in this convo advocating for it, and as further evidence to that point you’re still literally incapable of even understanding my argument all these comments later despite me literally telling you that my argument is “initiating violence is bad.”
I’m gonna go with “nuh uh” on this one, I straight up do not believe you truthfully aren’t a “fan” of initiating violence after having spent this entire convo advocating and excusing exactly what you claim you’re not a fan of. Something tells me you enjoy it, not sure what, but I think it was you literally saying you enjoy it.
Anything’s possible when you make shit up kiddo