• shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    proton masses are rather small - inconvenient

    the distance light travels at a certain time - then it’ll just be based on our artificial units of time

    cesium oscillation i don’t know much about but from what i quickly read it’s also about keeping time, 1s to be precise, which is still an arbitrary unit

    • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Time can be non arbitrarily defined as a round number value of times cesium oscillates between two hyperfine states, to allow time to be non arbitrary and still a useful size.

      • Zorcron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        The round number would still be arbitrary, no? It’s roundness would be based on the base 10 counting system, which is also arbitrary.

        • atomicorange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Not arbitrary. Base 10 because we usually have 10 fingers and those are useful for learning counting. If you have to choose a base, 10 is a good option for humans.

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        That’s still an arbitrary number to pick, and the choice of cesium oscillation seems pretty arbitrary in the grand scheme of things.