• Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Wayland is the one thing that fixed a whole shit-ton of my problems overnight and now I find out nobody wants to use it under any circumstances.
    ¯\(ツ)/¯ Alrighty then

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Almost everyone uses it. We just never make posts about “our configuration works effortlessly, give us attention”

      Only people with a bone to chew and shit to stir feel the need to post such things. Back in the day it was people who felt superior for debugging their steaming pile of init shell spaghetti, now it’s people who just can’t live without diving into X11 configuration files.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s been some time, but the biggest pain point for me on X11 was 4k@144hz. Short of some xrandr tweaks I couldn’t manage to set, Wayland immediately worked perfectly.

        I suspect I ran in to x11’s limit in that case.

    • gerryflap@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The people who use it happily don’t make memes about it. I do have some weird errors every now and then, it’s definitely not as stable for me as X11. However X11 wasn’t very smooth with my multi monitor setup, and Wayland improved the smoothness of my PC enormously, so the random issues every now and then are worth it