I posted the answer in full because that was the output. Anything else would have been manipulation on my part. However, I don’t think the same answer can still be reproduced in short time.
Of course, LLMs currently also give counterarguments, but for how much longer?
What do you expect? A one-line answer to a complex question?
You should be interested in this because it is already influencing public opinion. Whether you think that’s a good thing or not is irrelevant—it’s simply a fact, whether you like it or not.
What else can I say, except that it doesn’t make sense to bury your head in the sand. I’m not a big fan of LLMs, but I’m aware of the fact that billions of people already use this tech in all areas of their lives. That’s a fact, and your rejection doesn’t change that at all. If you had read the post properly, you would understand that the issue here is the influence this technology has on opinion-forming. My opinion: it is ushering in an age of targeted disinformation. I had hoped to hear your opinion on this, but it seems that even a basic understanding is impossible due to your refusal to accept reality.
Do you believe you are the center of the world? Do you believe that what you read on a low-reach social media application is reality? Seriously, you should wake up.
If you think LLMs are irrelevant, there is nothing more to say.
Um. tl;dr. Did YOU read it? You didn’t edit out the AI’s comment, at least.
What do you think this adds to any discussion? Is this meant to illustrate how we’re in a disinformation age?
I posted the answer in full because that was the output. Anything else would have been manipulation on my part. However, I don’t think the same answer can still be reproduced in short time.
Of course, LLMs currently also give counterarguments, but for how much longer?
What do you expect? A one-line answer to a complex question?
What I expect is comments written by humans containing thoughts they came up with themselves. I don’t care what an AI pretends to think.
You should be interested in this because it is already influencing public opinion. Whether you think that’s a good thing or not is irrelevant—it’s simply a fact, whether you like it or not.
I should be interested in what? I know that people use AI to form their opinions, does that mean I also need to read slop?
What else can I say, except that it doesn’t make sense to bury your head in the sand. I’m not a big fan of LLMs, but I’m aware of the fact that billions of people already use this tech in all areas of their lives. That’s a fact, and your rejection doesn’t change that at all. If you had read the post properly, you would understand that the issue here is the influence this technology has on opinion-forming. My opinion: it is ushering in an age of targeted disinformation. I had hoped to hear your opinion on this, but it seems that even a basic understanding is impossible due to your refusal to accept reality.
The fuck do you mean bury my head in the sand? You’re not giving me any reason why I should read AI written slop. What are you on about?
Do you believe you are the center of the world? Do you believe that what you read on a low-reach social media application is reality? Seriously, you should wake up.
If you think LLMs are irrelevant, there is nothing more to say.
Mate. Where did I say LLM’s are “irrelevant”? Are you hallucinating? Did the AIs infect you with their hallucinating?