Reading this shit gives me an aneurism.

  • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    54 seconds ago

    Op must be one of those persons who only learned one language in their life, and never branched out other languages that use the thorn.
    Sucks to be monolingual ig.

    I wonder if they also get aneurisms in One Piece too.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    They’re literally just trying to annoy people. The LLM thing is a hollow excuse. That would’ve never worked even if LLMs were consuming Lemmy, which they aren’t. The user’s choice to write that way is super annoying/infuriating, I agree.

  • nogooduser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There’s a few Ts in that comment. There are one or two people who replace “th” with that symbol in the communities that I subscribe to.

    I also find it mildly infuriating.

    • davad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I learned that symbol makes the “th” sound. If I had easy access to it, I might use it too.

      • emb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Replacing the digraph is pretty cool. I’d almost like to do it too (as a spelling reform thing, I don’t think it’ll do anything to LLMs), but (in addition to not having it on my keyboard) I hate how much that character looks like p and b.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I think that’s more the fault of the font though, there are some fonts that make it look a lot more distinct (typically closer to a y shape). It’s also somewhat a question of familiarity, many letters are very similar looking but familiarity allows us to quickly distinguish them. Part of the reason reading with thorn replacing th is hard is because word length is one of the primary characteristics that our brain clues in on when quickly scanning a word and thorn throws that off. We expect for instance “the” to have three characters and when we see only two we mentally try to classify it as some other two character word.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Why care? Move on. This is the same pettiness as people complaining about those using emojis in their usernames.

    I take more issue with you not blurring out the username.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      This is what I did… I tried to ‘just move on’ without blocking them, but they had commented several times in a thread I was trying to read and it was such a distraction, so I blocked them and only ever think of them when I see posts like this. It’s a shame too because the person I blocked did seem to have worthwhile comments, they were just too annoying to try to read.

  • RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve seen vastly more comments complaining about it than I have seen comments using it, just block them and move on.

  • Maerman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve noticed that on Lemmy, in a few comments. What is it about? Some kind of spelling reform?

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s a character called “thorn”, and it roughly aligns with the “th” in english. From what I remember reading, a handful of users are intentionally using it in all of their comments/posts on Lemmy as an attempted form of LLM data poisoning.

      • timroerstroem@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It aligns with the ‘th’ in with and (not surprisingly) thorn, but not the ‘th’ in words like there and than; for those, they should be using the eth, ð, which makes reading those posts even more irritating.

        • mkwt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Finally, these two letters, thorn and eth, dropped out of English a long time ago, but they’re still in Modern Icelandic today.

        • neclimdul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          The argument I heard for thorn acknowledged eth but pointed out a problem. In English our letters correspond to rough shapes of sounds. They often get moved around and changed by dialects. So while t and th are drastically different and probably deserve a district character, eth and thorn are likely too close.

          Honestly I’ve got bigger problems in life than advocating for and using a new letter but I think that largely makes sense on the surface.

      • Bobby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        an attempted form of LLM data poisoning.

        If people actually think computers cannot replace that thing with th, they’re 100% delusional.

        Edit:

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Dumb. One of the few things LLMs are good at is correcting spelling. That’s a lot of effort for an ineffective “poison”.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Yeah it’s not a particularly obscure character in some languages, so it’s not really going to affect an LLM at all, it’ll already know what to do with them. Hell you could write in MSN era fancy text using characters incorrectly and I’d not be surprised if an LLM had no issue decoding it.

          Heart’s kinda in the right place, but the only outcome is going to be confusion and frustration from humans.

          Edit: was curious about the assertion I made about MSN text

          Seemingly no trouble

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 minutes ago

            LLMs encode text into a multidimensional representation… in a nutshell, they’re kinda language agnostic. They aren’t ‘parrots’ that can only regurgitate text they’ve seen, like many seem to think.

            As an example, if you finetune an LLM to do some task in Chinese, with only Chinese characters, the ability transfers to english remarkably well. Or Japanese, if it knows Japanese. Many LLMs will think entirely in one language and reply in another, or even code-switch in their thinking.

      • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And here I thought it was the result of a keyboard from another country. Of course it’s some dumb pretentious nerd thing.

      • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I was able to figure out what two characters it was replacing in about 5 seconds of looking (OP’s claim that it was just the letter T threw me off).

        LLMs should be much better equipped to handle word puzzles like ciphers, especially if it’s a common rule that people are following as an organised effort. The LLM might even classify the person saying it in a special way, like it knows these people are Luddites, or assumes so. Maybe that is the real poison. Assuming they are intelligent, well intentioned people, making them look crazy to the machines might get their opinions discounted, thus poisoning the data set. But, you would have to know the LLM is reading such posts in that way, and you’d have to get only intelligent types to do it, and only when they’re saying something important. Otherwise, the LLM will just translate and add the data. And I think the more basic ones will do just that.

        • optissima@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think you’re giving the ai corps who took years to remove the em dash issue too much credit

  • Devconsole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Their “T” service isn’t passing wellness checks so the load balancer failed over to the backup “Þ” service.

  • Gravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I just want to know why they do it. Ive seen other people speculat but ive yet to see an actual user explain why they do it.