I get your point, but what would be an alternative term for content or creators in general? One that encompasses all types of media. Maybe “artists” and “art”, but that doesn’t always fit, I guess
- 0 Posts
- 19 Comments
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•"It's not work" - Austrian Chancellor Stocker declares that in his view caring for children isn't workEnglish
4·5 days agoThis reminds me of a deleted scene from The Incredibles (2004) in which Helen confronts a party guest who said that it’s a waste of potential to spend years caring for your children instead of working:
I generally agree, but those terms you prefer are specific about the type of media. I think “creator” and “content” are still the most neutral and catch-all terms, but they have been tarnished by commercialized platforms.
I usually avoid corporate stuff, but not always. What term do you prefer over “creator”?
I think the next tier would be to only pirate media that is licensed by huge corporations and still buy indie media to support creators
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Games@lemmy.world•Mass layoffs expected at EA as the now-private publisher reportedly tells its new debt masters that it's going to cut $700 million in annual costsEnglish
12·7 days agoA good run that ended a long time ago
deleted by creator
This is very close to how I act towards my dad whenever he complains about his Windows 11 updates and performance.
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Effective Feedback Mechanisms for Anti-Consumer Approaches to Gaming?
3·27 days agoI have almost never purchased any games from all these shady companies like EA/ActiBliz/Sony/Microsoft. I usually prefer indie games and buy DRM-free stuff from GOG whenever possible. Yet, ironically it feels like I’m not doing my part because I have nothing to unsubscribe from or start boycotting.
I guess spreading the word is also a way to contribute.
Thanks for the advice, creepy sheepy
Another example of how FOSS contains dark patterns and uses anti-competitive practices against big tech. Typical. /s
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•If you could see one statistic above every person's head, that is updated in real time and never goes away, what would you choose?
1·28 days agoYeah, be wary of lizard people
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•If you could see one statistic above every person's head, that is updated in real time and never goes away, what would you choose?
1·28 days agoThe concept of assists makes it even more interesting. I can think of a bunch of people who would have a huge number.
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•If you could see one statistic above every person's head, that is updated in real time and never goes away, what would you choose?
4·28 days agoNo need for that because by definition it’s only displayed above people’s heads. You can tell someone isn’t human if nothing is displayed over them.
LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pubto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•If you could see one statistic above every person's head, that is updated in real time and never goes away, what would you choose?
11·28 days agoThis reminds me of this animated YT video in which timers are displayed above peoples’ heads that show the amount of seconds passed since that person last shit their pants: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WgbI5orsSMY
Over night, social hierarchies are upturned, respect is earned and lost based on that number.
An unwritten rule apparently. Thanks for the explanation.
Can anyone please explain to me why so many posters insert the word “rule” into the title? I’ve seen that a hundred times and everytime I wonder what the point is. I guess it’s some kind of inside joke.






That shortened headline phrasing is semantically ambiguous. With context it’s clear, but it can also be read as “Meta has caught paying nazis in order to post on Facebook”