Side dose of those Record books

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    Used to have a big green book called the Dictionary of Animals.

    My favourite was the wobbegong.

    I kind of wanted to be an astronaut, but by the time I grew up we weren’t really doing that any more and tbh it looks kind of dangerous. I also fart a lot, so I don’t think I’d be very popular on the ISS.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I had the Brimax Myths and Legends, started a love affair with ancient mythology and storytelling that lasts to this day.

  • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I didn’t have any of those but I DID have a copy of The Way Things Work by David Macaulay, which is an exploration of mechanical concepts demonstrated with adorable illustrations of mammoths. Kinda similar presentation, according to my search.

    I should get a new (old) copy.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Wow, memory unlocked. Childhood friends had that book, very epic.

      The computer mouse image was the greatest. It’s very outdated nowadays, by so fantastic.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Oh, cool that’s the one where they joke about the water being scared of the mammoth, so they put ‘walls’ on the boat to prevent it from being seen and therefore the boat floats instead of sinks?

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I just bought a new copy of that for my nephew for Christmas! Didn’t realize it’s been around for a while.

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Oh that’s exciting! I hope he loves it as much as I did!

        I can’t speak for the revised version, but the original was super engaging when I was a kid (probably got it around 95 or thereabouts, so somewhere in the 6-8 range), but not so serious or complicated as to distract from the whimsy. It’s also educational in a natural language way, which I feel is better for developing interest. It’s not difficult to read.

        It’s one of many things that led me to a deep intense curiosity about the world around me!

        • optional@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The revised version is also great. Most of the content is still the same, a nuclear reactor works just the same way as it did in 1995. But most of the IT topics are updated. Instead of a ball mouse you’ll find an optical one, instead of the CRT they explain LCD screens etc.

          There’s also a “new”(2016) book in the same style but for science instead of technology. It’s just as good as you’d expect it to be.

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    My school library pulled these books from the shelves because every time it was “library time” kids would always rush to pick these books first, and they said “all you do is look at the pictures” which is bad apparently.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 minutes ago

      My school library had a bunch of Garfield and Calvin and Hobbes comics and some of those how to draw marvel style books and Shel Silverstein poetry books with pictures that got me interested in reading everything else

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Fuck that reasoning. That’s what got me into the insects those creepy looking ones. How else are you supposed to describe a praying mantis, like it’s 1350 and carved into stone?

    • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Whoever made that decision deserves a punch in the face and should be demoted from adulthood, back to school.

  • JoShmoe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Fact checkers would cream in their pants if they ever got a hold of these. But not because they agree with what’s written in it.

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    i mean…

    ⊥ɥǝdıɹɐʇǝbɐʎ.oɹƃ /search.php?q=eyewitness+books&all=on&search=Pirate+Search&page=0&orderby=