• Samskara@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 个月前

    Spotify using several processes and GB of memory just play some music and browse a library is an abomination. WinAMP did most of that 20 years ago while using a fraction of the resources.

    Discord similarly is an affront.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      edit-2
      2 个月前

      don’t worry, this will all be solved now with incompetent vibe-coders, just give it a while

      or you will look back to this with a nostalgic tear in the eye. one of these.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 个月前

        God I wish discord just stuck to being a straightforward app without any of the fancy fluff that’s just not needed. I hate the super-flashy things that obscure visibility and divert your attention so much

        But it’s what they sell to people, and a minority seems to really like so

        • hornywarthogfart@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 个月前

          They had no viable business plan with which to pay back investors so this was inevitable. It sucks though…not a day goes by where I don’t grumble about what an insult Discord is to their users.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 个月前

        Same here. At first, I thought I was going to get a better Discord experience with the dedicated ‘app’. Nope. Another web app crammed into Electron, multiplying the overall browser footprint on my system. It now happily lives on in a normal browser tab where my ad blockers and user-scripts claw back local control of things.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 个月前

      If you have Spotify Premium, try a third party client. Even GUI clients like Spotify-qt are memory light [though not at feature parity] whilst terminal clients like ncspot, spotify-player take 1/10th the memory. The latter even supports Spotify connect.

    • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 个月前

      Correction, Winamp still does this today while using a fraction of the resources.

      Though if you’re on Windows I’d recommend Xmplay instead, it plays basically everything.

      I’m on Linux and I use VLC.

    • NotSteve_@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 个月前

      For Spotify it sort of makes sense though, right? It buffers a few songs ahead of time so using any free RAM seems valid

      • DaGeek247@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        2 个月前

        The average spotify 3:40 song is going to be about 4MB. This only changes to triple (10MB at the same length for premium and high quality) that size when you pay for it.

        If Spotify is using more than 50MB on the audio cache, they absolutely deserve to get ragged on for it.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 个月前

      Spotify suck at programming. When using the app offline, I can view and play songs and podcasts directly or from the queue, but the menu to add stuff to the queue doesn’t load.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 个月前

      Really? I have it running right now with 0% CPU usage and around 100MB of memory. Something’s wrong with your setup.