• TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I think the general idea is that you shouldn’t mess with conservation land. The general public isn’t educated enough to know what is invasive and what isn’t, so the rules say don’t disturb stuff. But if someone who was educated was in the park removing invasive species, they are almost certainly “breaking the rules”, but doing a net positive thing.

    So if you see it…you didn’t.

    • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      ls “conservation land” something special, then?
      English Wikipedia seems not to know it, and dictionary translated it to “Landschaftsschutzgebiet” in my language, which is like the most unprotective “protection” category there is.
      Basically you could even build a huge tourist ressort or industrial complex in one of those if you know what you are doing…

      • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m from the states and I took this as “national park” (or perhaps state) land. It’s land intended for ecological conservation.

        • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          But in that case, pretending to be a blind prirate makes even less sense!

          From the National Park Service website:

          Report invasive species. Locating invasive species just as they are beginning to invade an area and treating new infestations quickly is a management approach called Early Detection Rapid Response (EDRR). In a national park, let a ranger know when you spot invasive species. They will want to know the location (GPS coordinates if possible), the name of the invasive species, when you saw it, and photos of the species.

          So thoroughly note it and report that stuff!

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It could mean anything from private land with an easement to prohibit building on it to a National Park, depending on context and jurisdiction. It’s just a non-specific term for “land that is conserved in some way.”

        • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, I guessed that much myself by now.

          So there is no deeper meaning but the meme is just crappily ill-defined and because of this actually doesn’t make sense.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I mean, it’s sufficiently descriptive to imply that randos shouldn’t (ordinarily) be messing with the plants on it. As a native English speaker, it makes sense just fine.

            • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              randos shouldn’t (ordinarily) be messing with the plants

              But the meme doesn’t talk about randos.

              It specifically mentions the meme creator seeing someone “cleaning invasives”, implying that all people involved have some level of competence and know what’s going and that there isn’t any reason to pretend to be a blind pirate.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        The nomenclature is really messy across countries and even sub-country entities. The Portuguese language Wikipedia even highlights the mess:

        Nomenclature diversity across countries. // Some surveys estimate protected areas in different countries and regions are called by at least a hundred names, and not uncommonly countries have their own categories of protected spaces, roughly similar to the protected space concept defined by the IUCN.

        From that I guess the restrictions associated with those spaces also change, and in some you aren’t supposed to remove local fauna and/or flora, creating situations like in the meme (removing invasive species is against the letter of the rule, but within the spirit).

        • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I did, even did some additional research trying to clear up ambiguous terms (what’s a “conversation area”?) and looked up rules in another country (US) that was referenced by a less confused person.

          Meme still doesn’t make sense.
          Should even be the complete opposite.
          If you recognize it, report invasive species!

          If there are hidden context clues I missed, please point them out to me, so that I will learn why I am the moron and not some of the others here that post stuff that just don’t make sense given the facts.

          Is the original post perhaps satire of some kind?