• osanna@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Cost of doing business. They most likely made an insurmountably greater amount from doing what they did compared to the fine.

    • Emi@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Why not start using percentage of profits instead of fixed amounts?

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s said every time. Until we get government that gives a shit about it’s constituents and aren’t a bunch of geriatric paycheck collectors it’s not happening.

      • tomiant@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Because since money is power, capitalism is a form of government, where 1 dollar = 1 vote. So if you make like $350 billion every year, like Google, you get that much more power to say how much companies like, say, Google, should pay in fines for breaking the law. You also get to say what the law is!

        The moral of the story is: if you make around $350 billion a year, then you and google have equal say in the matter, and if you don’t, well then please pipe down and enjoy your serfdom under corporate feudalism and be happy they let you live.