I’ve been having a big think over Linux distros. See, I’ve been looking back at my still-new Linux experience of nine months, and wondering how my own journey can help other people get started with FOSS operating systems. Whenever the topic of a Windows refugee-friendly OS came up, I would recommend Linux Mint because, first, it’s the one everyone says, and second, it was the Linux OS that I started with, fresh off Windows.

I always follow that up with a comment about how you don’t have to stick with Linux Mint if you don’t want to. You can do what I did, which is to dip your toe into the Linux distro water and find something that suits you better. But if I’m setting up Linux Mint as “my first Linux distro,” why not just skip the middleman and get right into the distros that have a bit more meat on them?

  • epicshepich@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    I don’t get why everyone and their mother has to shit on Mint. I started my Linux journey on servers, but my first home computing distro was Ubuntu 16. It wasn’t what I needed so I stuck with Windows 10. After migrating my homelab server to Almalinux 9 and realizing how much better life could be if I just purged Microsoft from my household, I installed Linux Mint on my laptop and have used it ever since. If I had any less of a warm welcome into Linux for home computing, I might have just stuck with Windows 10.

    I consider myself somewhere between a layperson and a power user. I’m pretty comfortable with BASH since I work with servers a lot, but low-level stuff is still black magic to me. I’m aware that KDE Plasma has a ton of cool bells and whistles (I use Nobara on my gaming rig), but other than KDE connect for sharing clipboard, I don’t really need any of that fancy stuff on my laptop. And I think the typical layperson probably won’t even set them up in the first place.

  • Fierro@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ve seen a similar thesis in video form yesterday, I feel like in both cases the author forgot the fear they had before making the choice and think that sidestepping the solution to that part is no biggie.

    But we’re talking about people who are afraid of a black box where you type text, they need as little friction as possible.

    Hindsight is 20/20

  • tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I think the problem here generally stems from the view that a system which is explicitly not Windows should be suitable for “Windows refugees”. (Haiku would come to mind sooner than Linux, but I don’t want to open that can of worms here.)

    Mint isn’t “like Windows”, not even Zorin is “like Windows”. No operating system (except perhaps ReactOS) that isn’t Windows aims to provide a good sanctuary for “Windows refugees”. The expectation that a Linux distribution must be “suitable for Windows users” will lead to many more disappointments.

    Bill Joy (google him if necessary) once said (quite rightly):

    What was the goal of the Linux community–to replace Windows? One can imagine higher aspirations.

    Take Linux for what it wants to be (a free implementation of parts of V7 UNIX for reasonably modern systems), and you’ll immediately be less disappointed.

    (Disclosure: As far as Linux is concerned, I currently only use Gentoo myself—not because it’s great for Windows users, but because it’s a great Linux distribution.)

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      A distro for Windows refugees isn’t an exact copy of Windows. They can stay on Windows for that.

      It is the Linux flavour that is the easiest to use after working with Windows your entire life. It should have all the advantages a Linux system brings, but have the same type of logic how UI is organized as Windows, and offer the same advantages.

      Like out-of the box drivers that work on every hardware. A setup with easy to understand questions that aren’t technical. A file system with similar structure. A GUI setting menu where the most used settings can be changed without opening a command window. …

      • tux0r@snac.rosaelefanten.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A file system with similar structure.

        There is no Windows-like file system fully supported for / as far as I know. You can’t have C:\ on Linux.

        A GUI setting menu where the most used settings can be changed without opening a command window. …

        That’s not really distribution-specific though. All GUI configuration tools I know are distribution-agnostic.

  • cschreib@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The vast majority of users don’t need “more meat” in their OS. They need stability. Linux Mint works great on that front, I don’t see the need to loose focus with multiple new distros. Not everyone needs to jump distro every month.

    Disclaimer: i’ve been using Linux Mint for over 10 years without ever hopping to something else. And I’m a software engineer, not a casual user.

  • turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I think it really depends on the type of refugee we’re talking about here.

    If they’re interested in tinkering, the starting point doesn’t really matter that much. Just let the refugee know that distrohopping is allowed. If you hear that some new distro has an awesome feature, give it a go.

    If we’re talking about a person who hates tinkering and tweaking, the first distro suddenly begins to matter a lot more. That’s the distro they will be stuck with for several years, so Mint is definitely a solid option. Actually, most distributions that are Debian or Ubuntu based should be fine.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Much as I love KDE’s beautiful themes, Mint is just… easy. I’ve spent so many years hunting dependencies like lost scrolls in ancient tombs and beseeching ancient wizards of the right incantation to fix my Bluetooth that I just quit. As soon as it stopped being broken, I stopped trying to fix it. Mint hasn’t broken on me. Everything works exactly as intended, right out of the box, with few exceptions.

    I have been dreaming of this day for ten fucking years. For now? Hon, I am good. I’m not having to spend hours digging for old posts on AskUbuntu or some other forum for the solution to errors no one else has had since Obama’s era.

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Are there actual computer scientists with some hard evidence what works when switching OS? Because this article is just making stuff up to say anything, ie filler content/debate.

  • 474D@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Because switching from Windows can be intimidating and Mint is the literal opposite of intimidating. It’s boring, simple, and clean, thus the perfect stepping stone. At least, it was for me and quite a few others I know. I still install Mint first on new hardware

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’ve been using Linux for more than 20 years. I’ve started with Ubuntu, then I’ve used Arch for a long time, then back to Kubuntu, then… I’ve recently switched to Mint.

      I need to do work and not worry about anything: Mint is super clean, fast, with old school GNOME vibes (GNOME 3 is utter shit).

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    18 hours ago

    As long as people are moving away from Windows and Mac, who cares? You’re never gonna convince most people that their OS should be interesting and worth talking about. Take the W.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      As long as people are moving away from Windows and Mac

      If people don’t like it or Linux Mint doesn’t meet their needs, they will go back to Windows or switch to MacOS. The article points out that there may be better stepping stone distros these days

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I guess I had a kneejerk, a lot of times when someone starts up like this it always feels like a veiled “people don’t like my favourite one” type of thing. He’s pretty even handed and nuanced beyond that, credit where credit is due.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I strongly dislike how the zone is getting flooded with “now it’s not X, but Y” in terms of distro recommendations.

    Not knowing what a distro is and where to start is one of the main issues with people who may want to switch to Linux but don’t know how to do it. If Mint getting called out as a good place to start allows them to switch, then they should install Mint. If Ubuntu is all they have heard of, and it makes them try the switch, then they should install Ubuntu. Tbh, the only really dangerous approach is starting with something like Arch which, despite fantastic documentation, is probably more likely to turn new users away.

    Don’t let perfection be the enemy of progress. Someone who starts from either Mint or Ubuntu or whatever can distro hop later. Let’s not muddy the waters even more for our would-be Windows refugees.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If the majority of Linux users had your mentality, we would have passed “the year of Linux” a decade ago.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Default? I think the first thing I did once I settled down with my current setup was find a background of my own liking, not something curated. And it’s all mine; no one else has it.

          For those that care, all zero of you, it’s a bunch of frames from a cool star field animation, timed to rotate to the next every few seconds or so. Because I could not find anything that would simply play a video as a background, I made something that worked. If that’s not Linux level, I don’t know what is.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Thank you! I switched to Linux last year after a few years of flirting with the idea. My main work computer is a 2011 iMac and I got really tired of not being able to run some things and the whole planned obsolescence aspect despite the hardware being perfectly serviceable. So, I went and, I kid you not, borrowed Linux For Dummies from the local library. Prior to this I had no idea what a shell was or even a “distro”. And, honestly, the For Dummies book over complicated Linux a bit. It front-loaded everything and made it way more intimidating than it needed to be (and I’ve been using computers since DOS days and built a PC back in 2000). Which I feel like a lot of Linux guys do as well.

      Realized that Linux was lots of things and felt a pull toward Ubuntu, I installed it on the iMac and was instantly in love. After a few months, though, Canonical started pulling some nonsense and making changes to my system with updates like they were Apple. So I hopped over to Mint as I kept reading about how great it was and how “it just works” (a sentiment that brought me to Apple back in 2005). Now I stick Mint on everything. I kind of want to distro hop for the fun of it, but I’ve tested a few on distrosea and haven’t really found anything that draws me away from Mint. Yeah, I’m a bit of a normie. But normies deserve better OSes too!

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Totally. Linux is (in part) about choice. If you like Mint, use Mint.

        I’ve been a Linux user for 5+ years and played with a bunch of different distros. I have Arch (btw) on a laptop that I don’t have to depend on. But my gaming rig is still running Pop. Why? Because I like it and it’s stable. A bonus that it’s now bundled with Cosmic, because I like Cosmic too.

        But at the end of the day, it’s true that you can kind of do anything with any distro. The package manager is one obvious difference. I do like Pacman (from Arch) more than apt on Debian derivatives, but like, it’s just a package manager. Not worth changing a comfortable system over.

        Don’t listen to people who say you can’t run a “beginner distro” until the end of time. If you like it, you like it.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve been on Ubuntu for the longest. Mint looks cool. I tried it today. Its good. I had to do some fsck on my drives. I’m going to try pure Debian first. I’m tired of all the closed source drivers not working. I’m going to use old hardware and proven drivers.

  • fyrilsol@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I always hate it when people seem to try making the decisions for others based on what they use.

    It was bad enough when Ubuntu was losing faith with people because of its poor decision making, now we got you here saying Linux Mint is not the answer?

    Confusing people on an already confusing mess on which distro to choose when leaving windows is not how you win favorability with linux. Mint is the choice because it is not pitching freshly disgruntled Windows users into steep learning curves from the get-go. If you push them into something like Arch, you’re going to have people both pissed at Arch and at you for making their experience miserable.

  • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Mint is the one I’ve used the longest and for some reason keep coming back to, so its still my jam, even if its a little basic.

    • Concave1142@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If it works and doesn’t cause any friction, I see no reason to not use it.

      Mint on my game PC and Debian on my laptop.

  • eleijeep@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    17 hours ago

    See, I’ve been looking back at my still-new Linux experience of nine months, and wondering how my own journey can help other people get started with FOSS operating systems.

    An expert opinion, fantastic. 🍿

    • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think it’s a valid opinion. Getting a journeying newbie’s perspective is as important as what a 20 year vet might say IMO

      Both groups aren’t immune to getting lost in the sauce.

      • Janx@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s a journeying newbie, as you said. One person, who happens to have a large audience through their writing. That’s not a good reason to discourage people from using the most popular distro out there…