I was eating some chocolate when I imagined a world where Hershey’s was widely accepted, even by elitists, as the best chocolate.

Is consumer elitism just a facade for pretentious contrarians? Or are there things where even most snobs agree with the masses?

Also, I mean that the product is intrinsically considered to be the best option. I’m not considering social products where the user network makes the experience.

Edit: I was not eating Hershey’s. Hershey’s being the best chocolate is a bizarro universe in this hypothetical.

  • mech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    On the other hand, it doesn’t really matter. As long as it contains flourite, all toothpastes are fine.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Friendly correction for someone who frequently messes it up, it’s fluoride.

      Also charcoal toothpaste should be avoided.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            Wait, what? They’re not putting diamonds in there. Charcoal is softer than graphite, which is a soft mineral to start with.

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              Charcoal ranges from 50-100 on the Rockwell scale while tooth enamel is around 51.

              Charcoal can also contain silica since trees absorb it, which is definitely harder than enamel.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Is this the paper you’re looking at?

                If you found something else, can I have a citation? It’s actually really hard to find hardness information on charcoal. Graphite is 0.5 on the Mohs scale, while tooth enamel is 5, for reference.

                I can’t rule out that it’s actually harder than graphite and just seems softer due to being full of voids and crumbly. Then again, the activated charcoal in toothpaste isn’t exactly the same thing as the wood charcoal I’d be familiar with (or cow bone charcoal, for some reason).

                Silica could wreck you, if there’s a significant amount. The silica in normal food is probably a big contributor to tooth wear. If like the other poster says it’s a common ingredient I wonder why.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Hmm. Maybe we’ve found another dimension where brand matters, then.

                  Something in between enamel and plaque in hardness seems like the most advisable approach.