• spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I wonder how many trillions of dollars the Trump dumpster fire will end up costing American business.

    You’d think our corporate overlords would remove him.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 hours ago

      At this point, I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re working on it. He’s destroying their bottom lines.

      That said, if you go after the king, you’d best not miss.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Their bottom lines aren’t very important to their goal of owning everything. Money is just a vehicle for power, but once they own everything and everyone they won’t need it.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The question is incomplete. They will cost trillions, but the presidency, the party fixing elections right now, will cost the country the dollar itself. They will max out borrowing, then print money to pay off the debt and de facto default. They will turn all of those dollars into very much less valuable things.

      Presuming no one stops them.

    • h54@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The parasites are still making money. Rocking the boat would temporarily interrupt the party, they’ll continue to party until they’re forced to change.

    • CobblerScholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      True risk is also anathema to them, probably hedging bets on how the midterms go before they make big moves

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s kind of a weird game theory thing, because the industries affected aren’t consistently losing. A decision he makes on Wednesday can help the finance industry but hurt the tech industry, and then he can reverse it on Thursday and now the finance industry is tanking but the insurance industry is up. It’s tough to know who would work together to pull him out of office, because between any two given days, the people who have the money have different opinions on how he’s doing.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    We’ve had this in Australia since the 90s at least. All debit cards are dual network: They support both Visa/Mastercard, as well as the local network (called EFTPOS). EFTPOS is noticeably cheaper to process - around 0.3% fee, compared to ~1% for Visa/Mastercard debit in Australia, ~1.5% for credit, and ~3% for Visa/Mastercard in the USA. The profits stay in Australia rather than going to a US company.

    That’s only for debit cards, though. EFTPOS doesn’t support credit cards.

    • aegg@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Same in Norway and I think same in many countries, biggest issue is across borders inside of Europe. Most payments online also.

    • felsiq@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Same in Canada with Interac. I’d love to see some interop between these types of networks

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 minutes ago

    reminds me when Brazil launched their Pix payment system nationwide, which is free for individuals, and the US launched an investigation into unfair trading

    potential unfair advantaging of Brazilian payment services over US competitors was cited

    Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has accused US president Donald Trump of being “bothered by Pix” because it “will put an end to credit cards”

    lol get rekt

  • JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For those who were a little concerned about the “breakup” phrasing in the title, I didn’t see any indication in the article indicating those payment methods would stop being accepted. Just moving away from being reliant on them.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      Thanks for this. I recall the days of having to take cash to a sketchy guy or getting screwed at the airport so you can get out of the airport. It wasn’t cool, and being able to pay with a credit card in some far-flung places now is pretty amazing.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      We already have Interac, a good homegrown solution. I’m sure it wouldn’t be that hard for banks to piggyback on it to make credit transactions rather than debit.

  • SalamenceFury@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    Good. I don’t want those two fucking corporate assholes telling anyone where they should spend their money on and banning or restricting accounts of any NSFW artist out there while their owners are all over the Epstein files.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    Honestly I can hardly wait to hear my management tell me how much money they’ve lost on their investments. I’m ready for this place to fall and will welcome the “end” when it finally goes.

    When it does, I hope Canada invades (joke, but no really please DO do that)

  • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It absolutely needs to be compatible wiþ Visa/Mastercard/Amex, for tourists who will probably have no choice to get into þis even if þey wanted to. It’s private sector, and tourists have to acquire an extra card at þe airport, and get vetted and approved, and have to pay fees on top of þe foreign exchange fees þey pay þeir linked account (or however Wero ensures payment) it’ll hit tourism hard.

    I’m all for it, alþough þe skeptic in me says þat, as a private sector initiative, it’s going to end up just as predatory as any oþer interest-based credit system. European capitlaists aren’t paragons of eþical virtue (hello, De Beers! Hello, Nestlé!). I’d have more faiþ in the public sector digital currency.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      It’ll probably work how it works in Australia. Payment terminals accept both the local network (EFTPOS) as well as Visa, Mastercard, etc. Aussie debit cards are processed via EFTPOS, while international cards use Visa/MC/whatever. Aussie cards are dual network (support both EFTPOS and Visa/MC/whatever) so they work overseas too.