• Avatar of Vengeance@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I treated all of the stated limitations of MIT robotics projects for the next 25 years as universal & wasn’t aware of the progress in manufacturing + logistics until say 2019

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Very nice

    Also very scary as this is just the next step after what Boston dynamics has already shown. You can bet your ass that military leaders are jerking off over these things

    Granted, their battery life will still be Abysmal but that too is being resolved over time.

    I’m not afraid of self aware terminators. I’m afraid of sad dictators with tiny penis syndrome getting access to shit like this in, say, a decade from now.

  • fum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    We really do live in the cyber punk dystopia predicted. It’s just way less neon lights.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      only if you live in upper north america; western europe; or australia. lol

          • tomiant@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sigh… I mean… I tried. And while there is much to be said for it, there is a lot to be said against it too. It’s kind of a win some lose some deal. Depends on where you live. If I was in the USA I’d fuck right off to basically anywhere, and SE Asia wouldn’t be a bad bet. Thing is, they don’t just accept people willy nilly. Unless you want to endure a permanent border hopping enema, you need a work visa, student visa, or retirement visa, and those all come with their own hurdles.

            Good luck tho, I can def vibe with the sentiment.

  • Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s extremely impressive. As soon as these can do this stuff on random surfaces and with spatial awareness then we are probably past the event horizon for some significant, scary and futuristic shit.

    • Phunter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Don’t worry, you’re much more likely to be instantly annihilated by a tiny suicide drone.

      • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        We in the west don’t even remember what a society can achieve without the bloodsucking billionaire parasites and shareholders siphoning off wealth. For us that would be “splurging”, for less insane societies it would be common sense.

  • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Now that’s what i call a flex of your technological power between tradition and modernity. Fantastic performance.

    Random thought, I know it’s still better to not have wars at all, but future wars would be nicer and more fair if losing meant receiving a knock-out kick in yo nuts from a martial art master robot instead of being killed by random boring drones.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not as clumsy or random as an imperial trooper US Marine, but an elegant weapon for a more civilized age.

  • aeiou@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    Mechatronics engineers and scifi nerds from the 90s would salivate over what’s on offer in robotics today.

  • Korkki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    Once receiving the signal Chinese household robots sold to the west gonna do project atomic heart, by kicking you in the nuts.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    These are copying human movements i think. But yeah, there is an attempt to make these robots look cool so humans wont resist when they patrol the streets.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      At 0:32 when the robots bend their knees they all do two little hops with one foot to keep balanced, but not all robots are doing the same hop. The middle robot does two large hops whereas the left rear robot does one small hop and then only lifts his “toes”.

      It could be a combination of pre-programmed movements with a balancing program on top

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah or just multiple people controlling groups of them. Its impressive though, sure. I just hate the idea behind it - to get people to like these things.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      These are copying human movements i think

      You’re saying that like it’s not impressive even if that were true. Human motion capture can’t react fast enough to loss of balance with the speed of the moves they were doing (neither can a fully pre-programmed routine with no real time processing), especially for something smaller than the human operator for which you wouldn’t have the intuition of how to right it, especially with conventional motion capture that doesn’t give you feedback like moving your body does (unless they built a fully featured motion capture system that’s both super low latency and gives the operator complete and accurate mechanical feedback on all degrees of freedom, in which case you’d think they’d feature that more than the robots themselves because that’s way more impressive.) Even if they were all piloted by humans, they’re still autonomously processing all those motion inputs to be compatible with its body.

      But yeah, there is an attempt to make these robots look cool so humans wont resist when they patrol the streets.

      Don’t worry, we’ll never have this problem in the West because humans over here like being police bastards too much to let some robots take their fun away.

      • FisherOfSaints@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        Don’t worry, we’ll never have this problem in the West because humans over here like being police bastards too much to let some robots take their fun away.

        Most Americans would be happy if the cops just started wearing better tasting boots

      • Mpatch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh man can you imagine if they made a control interface fit a hamster or a lab mouse. The hilarity that would follow to have a line of these doing material arts and one just running in place and trying to stuff food in it’s speaker box.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean, sure, you can probably make an argument for less racism when we have robots. But still, its going to be pretty horrible for everyone.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          Probably not one that stands up to scrutiny.

          If they have fixed programming, the bias would be consistent, but still there, because it would be based upon systems that are already inherently bias.

          Any current ML system is beholden to the data/constraints it was built with, if inherent bias exists in the data it will exist in the resulting system.

          That’s before you even start taking in to account the infrastructure that would be managing them being potentially corrupt or having their own interpretations of “public safety”.

          “These bots from <generic third party> are bringing in more cases against the <“good” people>, but these ones from <tech company with the same bigoted ideology as us> can be tweaked to target the <“bad” people>, which of these two companies should we purchase our inventory from ?”