This seems like such a simple thing to me, and yet the US just can’t seem to get it done. What are the issues preventing this?

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    We tried it once, and quickly went back, is one.

    Might be a case of greener grass. Virtually none of us has lived without it, apart from Arizona, so we just don’t know what we have.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We quickly went back because one news story which blew a completely unrelated traffic incident out of proportion, and the driver blamed the time change for it. Despite living somewhere like Florida which was barely affected by the difference in sunlight.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I’m in AZ, I think y’all are so dumb for doing that. I don’t want to live anywhere that fakes the time. The days change throughout the year, they get shorter and longer , it’s natural, get over it.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Unless that was a well organized and faithful attempt to switch, that shouldn’t prohibit us from trying again.

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They last tried DST “year-round” starting in January 1974 and people quickly hated it, with support dropping from 79% before it started to 42% three months in. Morning accidents increased and schoolchildren were injured or killed.

        I don’t necessarily love the idea of the sun starting to rise as early as 4am in the summer, but I think if we’re going to stay with one we might as well stick to standard time year-round. We’d still have light past 8 PM where I live and it would mean activities better for the dark could start earlier. I see places wanting to take advantage of the warm weather for things like outdoor movies but they can’t start until after 9.

        • leadore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is the most reasonable approach, and it meshes with medical studies about how DST affects our mental and physical health. We don’t need sunlight until 9 or 10 pm, and the sun is supposed to be approximately overhead at noon, not 1pm.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Morning accidents increased and schoolchildren were injured or killed.

          With car culture as it is now, that’ll just be seen as business as usual.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      pretty much.

      the same issues all exist, they are just in the morning instead of in the evening.

      if you are on DST in the winter in the north it will be dark at 6-8am when people going to school and work. instead of dark at 3-4pm when they come home. Everyone thinks they will be ‘happier’ that way, but once they experience they will be lamenting that it’s dark in the morning when they wake up and we should switch back.

      Arizona is in the south, the daylight time shift isn’t as extreme. there is only 4 hour daylight difference, where as in NYC it’s 6 hours. And in Seattle it’s 8. In Miami it’s 3. DST shift doesn’t have much of an impact for Southern states as it does for northern ones.

      But timezones are longitudinal and it would be bad for business, etc for Miami to be an hour off from NYC.