You technically can but the btrfs implementation is problematic. It has gotten better but it isn’t remotely production ready.
It does support raid1, raid10 and raid1c2/3. The reason I like btrfs is that it is baked into the Linux kernel so I can manage it with the file system utilities. It also runs well on cheap mismatched hardware it I don’t need to spend a fortune on storage.
Doubt
If anything btrfs is a decent replacement for ZFS
Database performance on btrfs is miserable compared to zfs, whereas bcachefs was doing much better.
I say was because… see the other comment in the thread. :/
Those two aren’t in the same league.
It depends on what you are doing
On raid 5/6 ?
You technically can but the btrfs implementation is problematic. It has gotten better but it isn’t remotely production ready.
It does support raid1, raid10 and raid1c2/3. The reason I like btrfs is that it is baked into the Linux kernel so I can manage it with the file system utilities. It also runs well on cheap mismatched hardware it I don’t need to spend a fortune on storage.
Problem is, i seek good alternative for zfs for raid 5/6 filesystems on linux, so far i didn’t found any FS better than zfs for that purpose