Hey lemmy. I’ve been paying out of pocket to get stickers printed from online printing companies. But its getting expensive and I think I’d like to get a printer to do the job.

HOWEVER, I’ve been avoided getting a printer, because, well, the whole thing is just a shit show. Our household went through like a printer a year for almost four years. Between ink prices, and the printers just failing, we threw our hands up and said fuck it. Not playing this game, so we shifted to printing services or the local library.

So I’m looking for a very basic (I think?) printer. Honestly, a black only printer might even be fine. I’ve heard I think that maybe Canons or Brothers are the ones you want and HP’s are to be avoided. The purpose of the printer will be to print stickers on sticker paper. What printer should I buy?

  • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My wife has a brother black/white laser printer. I got it about 5yrs ago and still going with no issues. She does sell things and makes labels and also uses a small thermal printer that pumps out label packages. Not sure if that can double for stickers for you, but could be an option.

  • Alberat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I had a brother printer (mfc) that i bought and gave to my friend after a couple years. bought another and the colors are off but it works. the ink dries out tho so i was thinking my next printer might use toner/lasers. i just buy ink cartriges, i don’t refill.

  • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If you are fine with ink printers, get inktank which you can refill yourself with pretty much any ink you can find. Never buy ink cartridge one like ever. Also, I would opt out of ink printers if you are not using them so often and if speed is preferable. They are slow as fuck and in my experience, a seldom used printer would at some point clog and it is pretty much impossible to clean this shit out.

    As for laser ones, get preferably Brother. I have Lexmark and their toners can be refilled at home which is nice but I believe Brother toners if not easily refillable at home, can be refiled at print shops for cheap. Also, look for part availability so that in case of some part become broken, you can easily get a replacement off the web. Then you’re set!

  • Mylemmypt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I have bought a brother laser printer 8 years ago. It just stop working, because of a know problem of not turning on. There’s a workaround that a used, and lately let it always on, but it finally stopped working, even with the workaround. Although it was a good printer because I would have spend many times its value if I had used the cheap ones. I also have a xerox and canon laser printer and so far so good.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    After a long time with HP printers, i switched to Epson Ecotank series. Way better with regards to ink usage and prices.

    Key features for me: all-in-one device that also scans and copies, feeder for the scanner, double-sided printing, color.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The Brothers are really good, but the Ricohs closely behind and a little cheaper. Both with relatively few bullshit going on.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Brother laser printer. Mine’s going on 9 years now, a cartridge lasts so long I have to look up how to change it when it finally needs it.

  • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You are correct that Canon and Brother tend to be the best straight forward printers. Brother is better for laser printing and Canon is better for ink jet printing. If you go ink jet go with individual cartridges instead of the combined cartridges it’s way less fuss.

    If you can do laser the basic Brothers just work. We had one in our woodshop for almost a decade. Sawdust spray paint etc. and it just did not care. It didn’t end up dying even, we just swapped it for a color version, and we’re on year 4 with that one.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’ve got a small Canon MFC laser printer/copier. No complaints at all. It only prints black and white but I tend to scan more than print so that was a big focus for me when I bought it.

    • Ænima@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Now THIS is a recommendation! My next printer (fuck HP) will be a Brother laser printer!

    • coalie@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I have been thinking about replacing my brother laser with a color laser. Not sure how much I would use it outside of printing commie things for Pathfinder games though.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I found my Brother HL out on the curb on a lightly rainy day. I had passed by it on my walk thinking it was an Epson inkjet, but on my way back I saw it was one of those Brother BW lasers the Internet nerds always go on about so I brought it inside and dried it off.

      Fired right up and has been handling my once a month or so printing duties ever since, still on the same toner that I found it with. Best non-commercial printer I’ve ever used.

      • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        The advantage is that you can get a cheap laser printer.
        They’ll happily print every day for years and cost next to nothing to run.
        They’ll also happily print after you didn’t use them for a long time.
        Ink printers are generally less durable, cost much more to run and their heads dry out if you don’t use them regularly.
        Color laser printers are expensive, big, and the color isn’t good enough for photos, only colored documents.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Color laser printers are expensive, big, and the color isn’t good enough for photos, only colored documents.

          I own two (identical) color laser printers, can confirm two out of three. They’re gigantic and the color isn’t very vibrant.

          However, they weren’t all that expensive because I got them used. Still not quite dirt-cheap like a black & white laser is, but affordable.

      • yaroto98@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        My brother color laser is decent, but the toner is expensive. So expensive that i buy knockoff toner. Which 95% of the time is solid. Until every once in a while a kid needs something printed that’s a photo. Not sure why, but it is absolute garbage at photos. Like not even close. Streaks and bands of color everywhere. I’m not even trying fancy photo paper, just trying to get details. A caffeinated adhd toddler with fistful of crayons could do better.

        But if you want to print a worksheet in color? Does fantastic.

        Advantage being you only have to buy one toner cartridge and drum.

        • CMLVI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Depending on the age, you may need a new drum unit, but I think that may also just be a deficit of laser.

        • affenlehrer@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Laser printers are usually lower resolution than ink printers and half toning is usually more difficult for laser printers. However, the results shouldn’t be THAT bad.

          • yaroto98@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Agreed, i’m not expecting good. But I’ve had pictures come out that look like an inkjet with the worst case of dirty print head you’ve ever seen.

            • affenlehrer@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I’m not sure which technology Brother uses but it kind of sounds like a damaged OPC to me. The printer might have multiple of them for the different colors. I think in consumer printers the OPC is often replaced together with the toner as a single unit but again, I’m not sure what brother uses.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It’s not inkjet but you can get passible color on laser. You need to go into settings and tell it it’s a photo and you want max quality. I have a Brother color laser.

          • yaroto98@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Yep, tried that. Made no difference. Tried linux and windows in case it was a drivers thing. No difference. Though on linux if I use a generic driver instead of the model specific one it’s marginally better and will win against the aforementioned toddler. If it took another similar jump in quality it would be in the realm of what I’d expect to come out of a laser printer for a photo. My google results only showed people complaining on brother’s forum and they responded with “use genuine brother toner”. And someone replied saying that fixed it for them.

            • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Knock off toner can be hit or miss. Even if it sticks to the paper it might not be the best quality.

              You could also try adjusting the paper weight settings. The weight settings control fuser heat levels by adjusting the print speed. That can sometimes have an impact on color quality.

      • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Toner is cheaper if you have a laser black only, lots of pages per refill.

        At work I’ve installed 10 color inkjet epson L6460 printers 2-3 years ago and most of them I still haven’t refilled.

        They come with 2 bottles of black ink and one of everything else, last forever, will print after 4 months unused if you do a print head cleaning (a few times in a row) and the Epson brand bottles are 8 - 12 bucks each.

        For home use a cheaper Ecotank would probably serve you just as well.

      • affenlehrer@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Black and white is more common in laser printers, less complex, cheaper and it takes up less room.

        Laser printers don’t just shoot color particles on the paper like ink jet / piezo printers.

        They “magnetize” a photo conductor so the toner particles stick to it and then usually transfer it to the paper using pressure and then fix it using heat. You can’t really do the first part for multiple colors at the same time so color lasers can get pretty complex to repeat this process for each color (CMKY, sometimes more).

        So why not an ink printer instead?

        • If you use them often they will cost you a lot. Printer manufacturers love ink printers because they can basically sell water (with a tiny bit of color) for the price of gold. That’s also the reason why they put you much effort into detection of original ink cartridges.
        • If you don’t use them often, the print heads tend to clog and guess what the printers use to flush them? Copious amounts of liquid gold (ink).
      • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Some laser printers can do color (the Brother HL-L series can’t), they’re just not great at hi-res color images.

        Laser printers are faster, more reliable, and are generally cheaper to operate in the long run, espesially if you are only printing once in a blue moon. Inkjet printers like the Epson Pommes_fur_dein_Balg recommended are better at hi-res images and are often cheaper up front, but are more expensive in the long run.

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        They are not sub par, they are dye based, which fade when continuously exposed to UV. Pigment inks are used in photo oriented printers, like prosumer and pro photo printers. Dye tends to clog less, pigment need more constant use.

        Laser color printers are better in every respect except for photos. Laser color printers usually have a 300-600 DPI native resolution, while 1440 is common in inkjet printers. Also, inkjet puts liquid on the page, which means that a good driver can actually blend inks to achieve a much greater color gamut, while lasers can only put one of the 4 basic CMYK colors in a point.

        Different use cases.

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We recently retired our color laser printer of ten years for an epson ecotank. I’m happy with it two months in, and only the black has depleted some 10% with the Mrs doing a couple of color copies daily.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      EcoTanks are so cool, you can buy their colors for cheap, you can get all colors refills for 15-20€ but they will last forever, bought last year, used them a lot for documents a few photos and a DnD sheet (with image included) and the tank is still full

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Only advice I can give is if you are just printing on paper, pay the extra $ and get a laser printer. Avoid inkjets - they are a complete scam and a waste of money. The toner will last 10x longer, never goes bad or clogs up the print heads, and the quality is better.

    I don’t know how laser printers handle sticker sheets, but for all practical printing purposes I wholeheartedly recommend a laser printer.

    Brother is also a solid brand. I have had mine for almost 10 years now and it’s still running like the day I got it.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      For sticker sheets you want a straight through paper path - this often means feed sheets one at a time, and catch them out the back instead of letting them to to the paper tray.

      Stickers meant for printing in printers generally will work with a normal feed though, so if you don’t mind opening your printer you can take a chance and normally be okay.

    • Maestro@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      My sticker sheets say they are suitable for printers. They work fine even in automatic tray feed. But I rarely print more that 1 sheet at a time.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Brother laser or bust. I use mine once a month Max and it’s been years since I even serviced it, they simply last forever with no maintenance. Color laser is significantly more expensive for the initial buy than inkjet but supplies are infinitely cheaper per-page. Problem being I don’t know how laser behaves with most sticker package paper, so you’ll need to research your preferred stickers to make sure they are compatible.

  • CMLVI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Echoing others, Brother laser printers. Cheap, reliable, and toner lasts forever. Initial one with purchase is like…40% of standard, and will still get you a few hundred pages. The regular ones are like 1200+, and the large ones are I think pushing 2k for like $70.

    You can do stickers on sticker paper with lasers, but idk the quality. Is it like…address labels? If so, lasers are perfect tly fine for that. Fine details? Idk.