Not that it matters much, ultimately it’s about becoming familiar with where stuff is put, even if it’s in a weird grab bag of /usr, /var, /etc/etc/etc. Still, I can’t help but check out Gobolinux from time to time.

  • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Just shove everything into /opt, all the big professional companies are doing it! They’d never take shortcuts, right?

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    weird grab bag

    You don’t mention whether that is adherence to the FHS or denial of it.

    One of those options is, to be clear, violating a standard.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago
    ~] cd /
    /] ls
    Programs
    Users
    System
    Data
    Mount
    

    very macOS-like, wish this would take over. am a convert from that side of the fence and tried a decade or so ago to reform linux by way of symlinks to something similar to this but gave up after a reinstall or two, too much hassle. just like CMD-C/V, relearned the new way.

  • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 hours ago

    TIL about GoboLinux. This is a cool idea.

    As a long time Linux user, I’ve always found the file system layout to be a bit esoteric.

    What are the criticisms?

    • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The main one that I’m aware of is that Gobo relies on a lot of symlinks to make their folder structure work. The traditional hierarchy is still there because a lot of programs have been designed around it. It’s just hidden.

    • k4j8@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      TIL as well. Biggest disadvantage for me would be not having ~/.config for easy access to most of my config files. ~/.cache is pretty convenient too. My ideal filesystem layout might include these directories but combine the program root directories into one.

      The structure of GoboLinux reminds me a lot of Flatpak.

      • juipeltje@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Is the home folder structure different on gobo as well? I never used it so i don’t know but on NixOS and Guix for example only the root file system is different, your home folder is like any other distro.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If you want different programs to have their own file structure, there’s always NixOS. It’s not as readable, but every package has its own directory in /nix/store.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      “This small thing does low-level thing different. Try huge pile of things instead.”

      That’s like a vegan reommending Islam instead of eating meat.

      • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Ehhh… I was more going for someone saying they like vegan foods and responding with “ooh, have you tried this recipe?”.

  • juipeltje@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Gobolinux is interesting for sure. I kinda feels similar to nix and guix, but more primitive if that makes sense.