• RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In Illinois, we passed a law acknowledging Pluto as a planet because we are the most open and accepting state.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I can’t be the only one who hates this “omg guys Pluto has to be a planet!” meme shit that won’t die.

    Who fucking cares? Yes, we used to call it one thing, and now we call it something else. Get over it.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thank you. I have a kid I work with that looooves space. To him, dwarf planets and regular planets are equally interesting. When we watch space videos that point out Pluto in some way, he’s just confused. Like a video about the 8 planets ending in a frowning Pluto.

      The kid: “Why is Pluto sad?”

      Me: “Well, bud, some grown ups are silly. They grew up thinking of Pluto as a planet and they don’t like that its status changed.”

      But to him, Pluto has no reason to be “sad.” It’s got Ceres, Makemake, Haumea, and Eris to be friends with! But nobody makes a big deal over them (if they even are aware of their existence at all. This boy has single-handedly educated many of my coworkers about them.)

      Point is, grown ups - let it go! Scientific reclassification doesn’t mean Pluto was ejected from the solar system or something. It’s still there and it’s still loved. It just plays with different friends now.

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My objection to “dwarf planet” is purely a linguistically aesthetic one.

    “Dwarf planet” ≠ planet

    …implies…

    “Dwarf person” ≠ person

    …and I feel like the people under 4’10" (147 cm) would object to that distinction.

    Also, “planetoid” was a perfectly cromulent word which Star Trek had been using for decades already.

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Different meanings. “Dwarf person” = a person with dwarfism, but “dwarf planet” ≠ a planet with dwarfism.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There are plenty of linguistically unintuitive artifacts kicking around (a peanut is neither a pea nor a nut, a jellyfish is not a fish, all of the “berries” which aren’t berries), but if we’re deliberately creating brand new labels in the 21st century, it might have been nice if we’d avoided that kind of oddness, given the opportunity.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s kind of a leap to hear “dwarf planet” and think that it’s denigrating people with dwarfism in any way.

          • GraniteM@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It’s not a direct connection, but trying to say a dwarf planet isn’t a planet, when it’s got the word planet right there, is generating the kind of semantic confusion that, carried forward, would lead to the conclusion that people with dwarfism aren’t people. The -oid suffix already conveys “is almost the thing, but not quite,” such as in words like humanoid, asteroid, android, and (most importantly) the aforementioned planetoid. Making planetoid the official word for “is in ways like a planet but actually isn’t” would have been working with existing etymology, rather than creating needless confusion.

            • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I’d certainly support not using “dwarf” in the names of celestial bodies any more, although it would make the Red Dwarf’s name anachronistic.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    They say “Pluto’s not a planet,”

    Do you think that Pluto gives a shit?

    Pluto is not gonna quit

    'Cause Pluto can take a hit

    And Pluto knows what Pluto is

    And Pluto knows that Pluto’s

    Hot shit!

  • Semjeza@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I’m only down with the “Pluto is a planet” crowd, if they rep Ceres and at least one of the others (Eris, Hamuhea, Makemake, or one of the others I forget) too.

    So there’s no version of the solar system where there’s only 9 planets. It’s 11+ lads.