• Semjeza@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I’m only down with the “Pluto is a planet” crowd, if they rep Ceres and at least one of the others (Eris, Hamuhea, Makemake, or one of the others I forget) too.

    So there’s no version of the solar system where there’s only 9 planets. It’s 11+ lads.

    • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’d be happy with:

      Pluto = planet

      Anything smaller than Pluto ≠ planet

      Nine planets. Now with clear non-stupid rules.

      • Semjeza@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        The arbitrary cutoff size being to ensure continuity of the scientific consensus in popular awareness when I was a child isn’t a stupid rule.

        Not even when a larger kuiper belt object is found.

        Not even, when since mass is the primary means of estimating size until we fly a probe out there, we estimate a smaller but much with much more mass object to be larger and we debate a 10th planet yet again.

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, people don’t realise that removing Pluto is the conservative choice when it comes to the list of planets.

      • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It was the only choice if we are expecting elementary students to memorize them all in order.