That’s how they get you. You’ll pay money to get AI to make it appear human. Then another AI will detect the AI writing and offer to change it for a fee. They are all in on it. This keeps going until society collapses… Or people stop using fake AI detectors.
1000%, and I’m disappointed at how few people are pointing this out. The purpose of the AI detector is to measure if someone has submitted something original, and I’m confident that OOP is not Mary Shelley.
I mean… No? We had plagiarism checkers long before these AI checkers, and the latter very specifically advertises that it’s meant to detect if an LLM generated the text, not whether it’s original text. Completely different tools with different purposes.
Yeah, it seems like it’s actually working as intended?
Telling quite literally the opposite of the truth is “working as intended” ??
Does it say “100% plagiarised”? No. It says it is 100% AI generated which is clearly false.
It isn’t saying “I recognize this text”, it is saying “this text is AI generated”.
And then it’s offering a service to rewrite it, with ai, so that it can’t be recognized as ai.
It’s doing SOMETHING, for sure. I just don’t think what it’s doing results in accurate results for what it claims to measure.
That’s how they get you. You’ll pay money to get AI to make it appear human. Then another AI will detect the AI writing and offer to change it for a fee. They are all in on it. This keeps going until society collapses… Or people stop using fake AI detectors.
1000%, and I’m disappointed at how few people are pointing this out. The purpose of the AI detector is to measure if someone has submitted something original, and I’m confident that OOP is not Mary Shelley.
I mean… No? We had plagiarism checkers long before these AI checkers, and the latter very specifically advertises that it’s meant to detect if an LLM generated the text, not whether it’s original text. Completely different tools with different purposes.
It’s not what the tool says, though