• CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, given that one of the points of Outlook (and most email apps) is to store a local archive that can be read even when offline.

        • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          No modern encryption, probably running SMTP, no spoofing prevention, no compatibility with modern protocols, could it even handle files bigger than 2Mb?

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Sorry to see you dog piled for an innocent question. We should see it as a good thing that someone who doesn’t know found this space.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Some people are being a bit pedantic about not technically needing the internet for email, and that’s true, but the pedantry is hiding the fact that actually email is really cool in how it exists in whatever form we want it to be in! It can be transmitted over internet, or over bare TCP/IP, or even peer-to-peer. Most applications don’t take advantage of how versatile email really is.

      Of course, Micro$oft makes it rely on an always-on internet connection because it’s better for their bottom line.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Email is older than the internet.

      Anyway, no, you don’t need internet for the modern version we have today either. You only need it for a few moments.