If you haven’t seen it yet, we recently made the announcement that starting July 1, 2026, the price of “Jellyfin Premium+ One Super Unlimited (with Ads)” will increase to $0.00 USD*. There has been a lot of enthusiasm regarding charge backs, and we’re simply blown away by the community’s response.

As we’ve had a high volume of inquiries, I’d ask if you could please wait until I’m off the support email shift to reach out about this issue. I’ve attached our schedule so you’ll know when it is safe to reach out.

Thanks, and happy streaming!

*Example price in USD. Exact pricing in other currencies may vary.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        136
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, some dude named jellyfin on Github keeps uploading the latest versions

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          47
          ·
          8 days ago

          Eh, I’d rather fork out the money than try the 1% chance GitHub is up to download it. Piracy is a service issue

    • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      125
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, I really missed the boat getting in on it when it was $0.00…

      Now I’d better get it at $0.0 before it shoots up to $0 next year.

        • suigenerix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          So true! But I found a trick where you can get Jellyfin cheap if you buy it pretending to be a resident of another country. Here’s some prices:

          • Vietnam - 0₫ (VND)
          • India - ₹0 (INR)
          • Indonesia - Rp0 (IDR)
          • Philippines - ₱0 (PHP)
          • Thailand - ฿0 (THB)
          • Mexico - Mex$0 (MXN)
          • Brazil - R$0 (BRL)
          • South Africa - R0 (ZAR)
          • Turkey - ₺0 (TRY)
          • China - ¥0 (CNY)
          • Malaysia - RM0 (MYR)
          • Egypt - E£0 (EGP)
          • Argentina - AR$0 (ARS)
          • Japan - ¥0 (JPY)
          • South Korea - ₩0 (KRW)
          • Singapore - S$0 (SGD)
          • Australia - A$0 (AUD)
          • New Zealand - NZ$0 (NZD)
          • Canada - C$0 (CAD)
          • United Kingdom - £0 (GBP)
          • European Union countries - €0 (EUR)
          • United States - $0 (USD)
        • Druid@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          In Ukraine, you’d regularly get a box of matches instead of the equivalent of pennies in small stores because they’re nigh useless there

        • adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          if taco johns sold it for that, it’d cost you $0.05. they round even 1c or 6c up to the next higher nickel.

    • Ad@social.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      @Zachariah
      @eager_eagle
      Have you not heard ? They will stop honoring it after the next update for totally reasonable reasons.
      If you are quick you could get the special 20% off discount on your first month that they are offering to their highly esteemed lifetime subscribers !

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    283
    ·
    8 days ago

    it’s a gimmick guys, this is done so the memorial day 75% discount sale sound like a good deal, don’t be sheeple

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    This is how you capitalize on someone else’s mistake. Made me actually laugh.

    It reminds me of Apple’s response to Vista’s pricing tiers in 2007.

    During the Apple keynote that year they said there was going to be an OS X Basic for $129, an OS X Premium for $129, an OS X Business for $129, and an OS X Ultimate for $129.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        yeah, it wanted a new computer. I installed it on a few boxes at work, it was pretty. In the end, driver issues and slow perf made it unreasonable

      • jinwk00@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Even better when the world couldn’t afford such outrageous required specs at that time, most were searching for low cost “netbooks” iirc

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    8 days ago

    I decided to bite the bullet and just pay the price increase. I will be looking for other services to use before I am charged again. Does Windows Media Player work well for you guys?

    • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      8 days ago

      I was using VLC, but after they converted their cost into a subscription platform of $0 a month I had to move. Was going to use Jellyfin, but now this… Guess I’m gonna have to start putting all my media on film

      • BuccaneerScientist@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        If you go the film route, consider using 8mm. Even though some people thinks it’s still too experimental i find the file compression to be far superior (one third file size after transcoding my library from VHS -> 8mm film) and they barely burst into flames.

        Besides who has movie nights without drinks nearby you can put on the fire?

        Make sure you use mixed drinks and not hard liquor as that will not put out fire and make your insurance company really annoying.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      8 days ago

      No, really. We don’t actually need your money. At least, not here and now.

      We have over $24,000 in the bank, and with average monthly expenses of only ~$600, that’s over 40 months (3.3 years) of runway! So, we have plenty of money for the near future.

      Thus, at this time, we want you to seriously consider donating to the authors of Clients you use, instead of (or in addition to) the main project. Client support is the hardest part of the Jellyfin ecosystem to keep going, and most of them are maintained by only a single person or very small team.

      • Joshua Boniface, project admin

      So give that applause-cash to a jellyfin client dev!

  • ifmu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 days ago

    Unbelievable! I just recently switched to and started paying for Jellyfin Premium+ One Super Unlimited (with Ads) to see if I wanted to pay the lifetime license. I’m moving to JamRudder instead! This is a disgrace!!!

  • kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I bought a plex pass about 5 years ago. I figured it would be a reasonable long term investment. I am starting to think I should have just gone with Jellyfin to start with.

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        It wouldn’t really, but you should already see “the writing on the wall”. Your own collections aren’t prioritized, and who knows what they’ll do next - putting ads into your own personal collections maybe?

        The final straw was when sent that “you need to pay a monthly fee to do remote streaming” email. It was intentionally worded very unclear… and they just so happened to have a “bug” around that time where many users got an error message saying that they needed to buy it, which isn’t true, because I had a lifetime pass on the server.

        It didn’t feel ethical for me to continue using Plex, when I needed to explain to some friends and relatives that they should absolutely not give any of their money to Plex.

        • amorpheus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          It wouldn’t really, but you should already see “the writing on the wall”. Your own collections aren’t prioritized, and who knows what they’ll do next - putting ads into your own personal collections maybe?

          A lot of people are too hung up on what could happen, rather than what is happening. I don’t see anything other than my own media since Plex can remember that that’s how I want to use it. In daily use I don’t see any of their additional attempts to generate income. I can share with anyone easily and not expect them to mess with any VPN or other tricks to connect remotely, and neither do I have to set any of that up.

          It’s nice that there are good alternatives, but none of them are a complete replacement for Plex. Jellyfin users on lemmy are just in a very special bubble within a bubble.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, the reality is that the people who bought the Lifetime pass a few years ago have gotten their money’s worth several times over. Hell, in my first year alone, it saved me more money on streaming services than I spent on the lifetime pass. So I made my money back in less than a year.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Why? That investment is paying off as it’s now significantly higher priced and has more features behind it.

      Jellyfin is not as good as Plex. The client is worse, the streaming options are worse, and the remote streaming and sharing is insecure and costs extra to do even remotely, pun intended, securely.

      • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I find the clients ok, not great, but I haven’t explored that space much, there are many more options than Plex. Plex seems to be making theirs worse. It actually seems like Plex tries to make my content in their client harder to find.

        The real issue is jellyfin is not as good at finding metadata. I’ve overcome this with tinymediamanager, but it still isn’t as good.

        For secure remote streaming, I’ve got mine behind caddy with https (caddy does the let’s encrypt dance it’s really pleasant, even works with my free DNS provider), which seems about as secure as Plex was. Are there other security aspects I’m missing that Plex provides?

      • kinther@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s a fair point to bring up. You’re right that it is an investment that has paid for itself in terms of a streaming service. Much better than hooking a laptop up to a TV and playing files directly, forgetting which episode you are on, or where you stopped watching a movie when you want to resume.

        My thought with Jellyfin is that I don’t generally watch outside my home network. I have sent invites to friends to watch my library, but none do. So most of the features I don’t use at all. I could have saved myself the money, learned how Jellyfin works, and probably set it up exactly how I currently use Plex by now.