I like the two-prong approach to civil rights. It gives a carrot-and-stick incentive to our oppressors. If you pay attention and give us what we want when we ask nicely, the other wing of the movement won’t hunt you down like the vampires you are.
Yes, when the hope that leaders would listen vanishes, it becomes a viable way to reclaim control of the country’s path. The problem is when people appropriate or misrepresent it to mean that it’s an answer to when you’re losing or insulted.
I like the two-prong approach to civil rights. It gives a carrot-and-stick incentive to our oppressors. If you pay attention and give us what we want when we ask nicely, the other wing of the movement won’t hunt you down like the vampires you are.
Violence isn’t the answer but it has to be an answer. A possibility. The last alternative. It is the reason peaceful resistance can work.
If violence is your last resort then you failed to resort to it fast enough
Violence isn’t the answer, it’s the loss of hope.
Violence isn’t the answer. Yet.
Violence works sometimes
Directed violence works incredibly well. It’s why the state tries to keep a monopoly on it.
Okay but violence built the success of modern Germany. Hitler utterly trashed the economy, and did some other bad things too.
Yes, when the hope that leaders would listen vanishes, it becomes a viable way to reclaim control of the country’s path. The problem is when people appropriate or misrepresent it to mean that it’s an answer to when you’re losing or insulted.
MLK & Malcolm X style
Exactly. Neither of them were wrong. They were both right, and they were both necessary.