It is not about being a simp or whatever that means. It is about LLM’s being trained on licensed data and the output being a transformation (literally a collection of functions) of that data. Meaning that it is virtually a certainty that the output without a license notice is a violation on the license of the data it was trained.
Not to mention all the others shit show that AI’s companies do , are trying to accomplish and stand for.
Either it gets ruled as fair use or the licence terms of the og code apply at which point GPL licences apply and and all the ai companies gonna become open source
If it’s stupid, but it works, it’s me, at work
Thank you for letting me know so clearly that you would like to be added to my blocklist!
Holy shit. Indeed I do! Sign me up.
I never expected this. I didn’t see it coming. It was all so sudden. But if you have to, do it.
I disagree with you wholeheartedly on the AI issue, but on this comment? No notes. Well handled.
Easier now, harder later
is this the sex community ?
Honestly, I have yet to see a single example of how the linux kernel is ruined because of AI. You know why? Because I’m not a kernel developer! In fact, I’m not a developer at all! All I see is, linux is working fine.
When is the last time your kernel broke? When is the last time AI caused the linux kernel to fail or falter? Not saying it never will happen, but I’ve yet to hear about it.
I mean, they literally just started using it. If it was running the kernel you wouldn’t see it yet.
Yup, easier to decide to break up with it.
