You must log in or register to comment.
consider two sets: set a and set b. both set a and b contain all horses, ane nothing else. they are always equivalent.
Sure, but does the set of all sets that don’t include themselves include itself?
Easy. If and only if the integer sequence A053169 contains the number 53169
Yesn’t.
set a contains all horses. set b contains all ponysonas
Gotcha. So all horses are purple?
But how can set b contain all of the horses if they’re already in set a???
I wouldn’t trust on category theorists discernment. They are patently bad at it.
Where can I find that template?
Obviously there’s the overall juxtaposition, but I really like the proportional dampness.
Does that mean you cannot distinguish between the two?
It’s not the same extent and also a jpeg. I’m sorry but I had to go through Instagram photo downloader hell for this
Don’t be sorry, I appreciate the effort :)
Thank you!
Category theorists 🤝 Topologists
Unable to distinguish 10 donuts from 10 mugs
