• Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve stayed away from Firefox for almost a decade because I don’t like the way that it functions (and I generally don’t like Mozilla as a company) even though objectively it’s a better browser.

    I’ve been using Zen for the past few days and I really enjoy it.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      54 minutes ago

      I’ll have to give it a shot then. I’m also not happy w/ Mozilla and I don’t really care too much about Firefox’s features, but I do want to support engine diversity, so I stick with it.

      So Zen might just be my cup of tea. As long as I can block ads, use my password manager, sync tabs across my devices, and it’s not based on Chromium, I’m happy. Bonus points if I can self-host the tab syncing.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        As long as I can block ads

        uBlock Origin / Privacy Badger work just fine.

        use my password manager, sync tabs across my devices

        🤷‍♂️

        and it’s not based on Chromium

        Nope.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          Yup. I’m just saying I don’t particularly care if it’s Zen or another browser, anything that fits those requirements is acceptable to me.

          So yeah, I’ll go test syncing tabs, since that’s the most likely to have issues. If it support Mozilla’s Sync, we’re good.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      True. The biggest difference seems to be that Arc is based on Chromium and Zen is based on Firefox. Given the two, I’d pick Zen just for the engine diversity.

  • harryprayiv@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Nixpkgs has been working on packaging it for more than 6 months now. That is a damning timeframe for both Zen and nixpkgs in IMO equal parts. In Zen’s case, that means that they are packaging their app in a very unconventional way and lagging with security updates, breaking standards (which usually means they are amateurs). In nixpkgs case, that means nixpkgs needs better

    buildMozillaMach
    

    support.

    I used it in an appImage and came away unimpressed. Using it in a tiling WM, I loved the minimalism….but I just wish it had better security and rendered webpages better. On Brave, websites literally look sharper than on Zen.

    Edit: most of my concerns were addressed by the dev themself just down the page a bit.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      Yeah, that’s always my first concern with forks like this. I care a lot more about security updates than UX.

      I used to use Mull on Android, but then the dev abandoned it and left me open to security vulnerabilities, so now I’m back on Fennec, which seems to stay updated. If Zen can stay patched, ideally in a largely automated fashion, maybe I’ll give it a shot.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      That comment about their security updates is a couple of months old. Zen has made significant changes to how they handle releases to stay up to date with Firefox, some of which were mentioned in the thread.

      The Nix package is functional. Nixpkgs sometimes chooses not to add beta software that is receiving very frequent updates, especially if the package takes a lot of resources to build. In those cases, it makes more sense for the package to be maintained outside Nixpkgs for the time being. NixOS users can get Zen from this Flake, which patches the official binary. COSMIC Desktop is another example of this.

      Pages not looking sharp sounds like it’s probably a font or scaling issue.

      • harryprayiv@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Thanks for the update. I did read down the page and saw that. The dev looked really receptive, cooperative, and pro about it.

        • priapus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Agreed. I doubt he expected the project to be anywhere near this popular considering how many Firefox forks there are, and he’s been doing a great job keeping up with everything that popularity comes with.

  • saga@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Been my daily driver for a WHILE now. Works fine for most things. Every now and then I run into some oddities.

  • async_amuro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Been using it for a while, I like it, but they do push out some questionable updates every now and then. Bugs I can understand, but forcing design changes on people aren’t great. Calling out the new tab change they made, I ended up changing a setting to deactivate it. Right now it’s my preferred browser, but I’m still open to looking into alternatives (Mac/Linux).

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      It’s in beta, so large changes are to be expected. I don’t think it’s fair to blame them for design changes right now.

    • Luca@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s still a beta, I think it’s unfair to complain about drastic changes until it comes out

    • JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Like the other person said, beta software is expected to go through pretty large design changes. It’s not a matter of “forcing it on the user” it’s a matter of “my software isn’t ready yet, I’m not certain what my vision is, and if you’re not willing to put up with me figuring out what I want out of this software then wait for it to release and I’ll keep it stable from there”

  • cevn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    One way to solve the “content appearing offset to right” problem is to move your tabs to the right side. Works pretty well for me…