- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- programmer_humor@programming.dev
You must log in or register to comment.
Definitionally in IEEE floating point, NaN is not equal to anything, including itself. The only real abomination here is B:
> Math.min() Infinity > Math.max() -Infinity >I mean, B does make some amount of sense, if you realize that it’s supposed to give you the maximum among the parameters (so you’d normally call it as
Math.max(5, 3) === 5).Well, and you can call that with zero parameters, because you can spread an array into it, which might have zero length. And then given these conditions, and if you don’t want to throw an error, then
-Infinityis kind of the least bad remaining option, as it’s likely to generally work with the rest of your logic.
I’m guessing C
Just because it’s not a number, doesn’t mean it’s the same not number. But what if it is? 🙃
yup
deleted by creator
A && B && C && D
Moot! Those ALL fail code review!
It can’t be anything other than B, right?
it’s not B
