• SaraTonin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t have a problem with the idea of a digital ID. I’ve been saying for years that it’s ridiculous that any time you want to do something even vaguely official you have to take a gas bill with you to prove your address.

    What I worry about is the implementation. It seems like it’s going to be a government app that stores everything. What company is going to develop that? Where’s the data going to be stored and how? What vulnerabilities does it have, and how has this been tested? Is biometric data going to be stored anywhere? etc.

    If they were to let me store my ID in my phone’s built-in wallet, then I’m happy. I know the security and I’m content that my data is safe and recoverable.

    But it doesn’t seem like that’s something that will be possible. So I’m going to object strongly.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In Spain we had digital ID since forever. In Poland we have digital ID since couple of years and having ID was mandatory for decades. There’s nothing Orwellian about it. Just because one shitty government supports some policy doesn’t make this policy bad.

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The problem is that these digital IDs in times of chaos and other things can turn out to be a trap that will not allow you to escape from the system.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No, oppressive systems are hard to escape with or without digital ID. Digital IDs don’t introduce anything special. By itself they are very convenient. If people don’t want them in UK it’s their issue. It doesn’t change how those IDs are used in other places.

  • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    You dont improve government by voting. You improve government with a gin ti its head.

    Look at the people getting everything they want from governments not what theyre told they want, what they actually want. They didnt vote in a fuvking think.

  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So much for it being optional.

    There’s a good chance it won’t spread due to the UK being a very good example of how awful it is. Works quite well with the age verification shit, now that even Wikipedia is under threat you can explain it even to rather stubborn boomers rather well.

    Over here they try different kinds of authoritarianism and surveillance instead. Like Chatcontrol (which by now became more of a Devicecontrol).

    • SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This means that you will have to lead a quiet life and not comment on anything, or at worst just watch violent films, for example, and pretend that you are decent, otherwise you will be arrested? Or will you be forced to pay a fine?

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Also not be unusual ir weird in any way. Serve. Obey. Grind your bones into dust for your masters. Kill yourself when it’s time. Do not be queer do not be trans do not believe in anything do not be disabled do not be nauroatypical do not…