i just really hate snap

  • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just don’t see the point of them when there are flatpaks. I’m not super knowledgeable on Snaps so maybe there’s some huge benefit I don’t know about, but they always just seemed like a worse version of flatpak to me.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The benefit to me is that snaps update as soon as the patch is pushed and they sandbox better than flatpak. Its also easier to maintain a snap from a dev perspective (idk if thats true I just read it on some fourm)

      I prefer flatpak because i like the name and flathub better but the development has kind of stagnated and a lot of their benefits are non existent. Flatpak sandbox is kind of a meme at the moment because most apps ask for way to many perms just to work.

        • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I should have added a /s.

          Canonical controls the back end and that (along with how canonical has treated snaps in Ubuntu pulling them in with apt calls) are two major reasons snaps get (justified) hate

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t see the point of flatpaks when there are appimages.

      Anyway last I heard snap has terminal/server apps and more system interaction.