• Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m not even against large vehicles as there are legit use cases for them. I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Should have to register them against a business or something that is licensed for truck use… Then let other people rent them.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

      This won’t help with rich assholes who want to drive around an F-950 or whatever, but will make groceries more expensive.

      What really needs to happen is to mandate a special license to drive anything over like 2500 kg, and only be able to register it to a business with a valid use-case. To get a “small car” license (B-type), you have to pass an easy theory exam and drive around a tiny sedan around a city for 30 minutes (at least in europe). Trucks have different driving characteristics and are way more dangerous, so the driving tests should be way more difficult too.

      Also, maybe this?

      Oh, also, ban private cars in cities. Like, completely. Cars are so dangerous that their amount in populated areas needs to be kept to an absolute minimum.

    • YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They already cost more and considering they have worse gas mileage, they paying more taxes on fuel as well.

      I agree with the parking though, back of the lot with ya.

      • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        in reality most (all?) states in the US don’t charge progressively more for vehicle registration based on weight, and even when they do, the thresholds are really high. So a F-150 weighing over 5000 lbs may pay the same as a Honda Civic weighing half of that.

              • frank@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Yeah, but I’m with the OP here. It should cost significantly more tax wise than it does to disincentivize it

              • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                and yet, people keep buying these things to buy groceries and drive on asphalt, so just fuel inefficiency is clearly not enough

                • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  the average carpayment is 750 new, 500 used. I bought a new car last year and my payment is $300. technically i could afford like a $1000 payment.

                  americans often pay like 30%+ of their income to cars. And yes, they actively choose to do this. Nobody is forcing them to buy a 60K F150 over a 30K sedan.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Texas used to, maybe still does. You made me try to look it up and couldn’t find a simple source. Plenty of states use MRSP or some measure of the vehicle’s value.

          Back in the day (Tulsa, OK) my friend had a 2-ton dump truck with antique tags (over 25-yo), paid $20. Meanwhile, someone buying a super-light Corvette was paying $650. (early 90s money)

          I say go on weight, maybe some factoring of value. Registration fees are paying for roads, if your monster vehicle is doing more damage, you pay more.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The F350 is the smallest vehicle where they charge by weight. Unfortunately they don’t check for how much you use it, so for the 6 times a year I use mine I’m paying $.10/mile - while someone else who uses it for hauling as a job is paying $.01/mile.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s your state. Just looked and registration fees and tags are all over the place.

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              True, but as a general rule until you get to the F350 class or higher states don’t charge that extra tax.

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Except in NJ where you get raked over the coals for your yearly car tax… errr… “registration”.

          It’s the damnest thing; they seem to lose my vehicle registration every year but my marriage registration is good indefinitely.

          • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The higher ev registration fee is to offset the fact that you pay no gas tax which is the main source of paying for roads.