I specifically said “full sized”, a pc with modern gpu and more than 32gb of vram is not a regular computer that most gamers have access to. If you are running a 7B model on a gtx 1080 or even an rtx 3060, you are not running a full LLM like the ones you would get from a subscription service
If you count only the cost for you, maybe it doesn’t consume water, but your toy still guzzled lakes as it was training. Plus, the hardware to run a full sized LLM is expensive, so you bragging about how it costs nothing is like a millionaire preaching to gamblers that it’s better to just be rich than try to win at the slots
That’s like… It’s purpose. Compilers always have a frontend and a backend. Even when the compiler is entirely made from scratch (like Java or go), it is split between front and backend, that’s just how they are made.
So it makes sense to invest in just a few highly advanced backends (llvm, gcc, msvc) and then just build frontends for those. Most projects choose llvm because, unlike the others, it was purpose built to be a common ground, but it’s not a rule. For example, there is an in-developement rust frontend for GCC.
Pissing is a scam to make you drink more, let it go
It’s digital audio, not analog, I doubt the GPU could ever be an issue. I suspect either there was a bug in the interaction between pipewire and the drivers (on one side or the other), or an update changed the default sampling rate of pipewire
Speaking only one language has nothing to do with this, there have always been subtitles.
YouTube does this so that one way or another they can say that more people use AI translations, and that shows investors there’s value in AI and Google gets more investments.
Laser printers are the best. You sacrifice the quality of dense pictures, but gain incomparable speed and reliability. It’s especially worth it if you print less often, because the ink dries up if you don’t print every once in a while and you end up buying new ink even though the cartridge is full, but the toner just sits there indefinitely.
3735 9284 9540 2743
16/14
042\
“Ternary operator” means “operator that takes three things”, like unary and binary operators take one and two things.
In C there is an operator for conditional expressions (an ‘if’ that you can put inside expressions) and it looks like this condition ? trueBranch : falseBranch. It takes three expressions, so it’s a ternary operator.
Except it’s the only ternary operator in C (and most languages, if they have one at all), so instead of calling it something like “conditional operator”, they just call it “the ternary operator”
I’ll have you notice that there’s also a gigachad in the meme, not just Kirk
AFAIK one of these are technical limitations, it’s just design choices. But in my experience, the design choices made following the gnome design guidelines tend to make apps with tiny faces
Gnome does have a lot of strong points, I personally use both
(after edit)
I have no issue with the text size, I have an issue with enormous empty space around the text. It’s fine if it’s not perfect on a 21:9 display, but this wouldn’t look good even on a 16:9 display.
I’m also fine with the text not taking up the entire width, I aggre that it’s less readable. But I think the window (not the text, the window) could utilise the width better.
I say that the messages could be a little more spread out (i.e. my massages could be a little to the right while other’s a little to the left) and just like the left sidepanel appears and disappears when the window is too thin, more sidebars could appear to the right when the window is very wide.
No, I want it to utilize the space a little bit more, this wouldn’t look good even on a 16:9 display. Which is a shame because when windowed it looks really good.
2560x1080 which is 21:9 full hd. Most programs don’t really handle 21:9 displays, but many GTK apps are particularly bad at it
Counterargument:
Admittedly this is a chat app, so there’s little to do. But still, it could stretch out a little bit more, maybe open the conversation info panel on the right
Relationship goals
It’s an analogy, it must be similar in principle, not in numbers. A subscription to chatgpt also costs less than what gamblers spend in slots. But whatever, I don’t care enough to argue much more