You must log in or register to comment.
Why’s the syringe got two 1’s on it?
Everything else looks pretty real to me that that’s a sign this might be AI
That’s a Fibonacci syringe.
The screw/nail is also sus. Why such a short thread?
Same as the logo on the plastic packaging. Pretty sure this image is AI generated. My only question is: why???
Yeah, the milliliters should be divided into 5 parts, not 6.
Could be a hybrid?
A Scrail? Nrew?
In case you miss the first.
To test the syringe for blockage? Idk
Looks like a crows nest.
When the officer asks you to empty your pockets, you say “no thanks”.
Unless you live in the authoritarian states of America
Or in Australia. Or anywhere in Europe where there are locally defined “high danger” areas where searches without a warrant are legal.
Yep, in Germany every train station for example is considered a high danger area where police are allowed to search you without a reason
We all know that the reason is usually “being a human of a funny colour” though.
Not a lot of wildlife needing rescue in high risk areas though.
I live in a high risk area and I need rescuing
stabs you with Fibonacci syringe
Now I want an explanation of wildlife rescue and the stuff in the image.
Explanation: AI slop.
Check out the graduation marks on the syringe. It jumps from 5 subdivisions to 6. Also, I guess the number that follows 1 is also 1!?
While I do volunteer in the field of wildlife rescue I’m also pretty sure this is an AI generated image.
However from what I can make out I do have some possible explanations:
A knife: Useful for things like cutting netting or fishing line or anything else an animal may get tangled up in.
A syringe: we don’t really use those ourselves as we aren’t vets, but some of our animals require antibiotics fast (within 2 hours of injury). Also euthanasia is usually done using a syringe.
Trash: the rest looks like the kind of trash one may find stuck to an animal, lodged in its throat, etc. Or it could just be litter that one would pick up to keep the wildlife area clean.
Gentle reminder to use your rights to shut the fuck up
Unless you are detained, physically locked into handcuffs, you can tell any cop to eat your ass instead of emptying your pockets. They have no legal authority to ask this shit unless they arrest you under reasonable suspicions.
Let’s not make such sweeping generalisations.
For example, in the UK, the police have the legal power to search you if the have reasonable grounds to suspect that you have something on you in a few categories, like drugs. There are even (yet more controversial) powers to search people just because they’re in a specific area (though there are restrictions on why an area can be so designated). You don’t need to be arrested or handcuffed for this, although you might be.
This is a great way to get detained, physically locked into handcuffs and not being able anymore to tell any cop to eat your ass.
Not in Canada, depending on how white and employed you look.
Explain… More to the detained than the white part
Insulting the cops is protected by the charter under freedom of expression. The cops have to be nicer to us (in theory) then we have to be to them.
Unfortunately they aren’t legally obligated to eat your ass.
Yet. Vote for me and I’ll make it the law of the land.
Finally a politician who supports my interests.
Cop 1: * Bang Bang Bang!
“We have a warrant to search the premises for contraband.”
Homeowner: “Let me see that warrant. Ok seems in order.”
*undoes belt, drops pants, assumes the position. “READY? START EATIN’!”
Cop 2: "This jobs got it’s ups and downs that’s for sure.
*eats ass with gusto
Cop 1: “Fucking perv!”
Is it bad that I interpreted the “bang bang bang” as Cop 1 shooting a gun at first
Normal if you are an American.
i… just realised they WEREN’T shooting, because of your comment.
Doing the work of the people, you got my vote.
Happy cake day!
Very unfortunate
We should add that change in with all the other police reformation that should happen.
You could always hand them a spoon, but your results may vary
Happy cake day!
“reasonable suspicion”: telling the cop to eat your ass 😅
Correct me if im wrong. Doesnt the USA has freedoms of speech? You can actually tell a cop to eat your ass without consequence unless the cop is a smooth-brain dipshit.
My friend from highschool said she was driving with her little brother in the passenger seat, and he apparently flipped off a cop. She told me the cop actually pulled her over and wrote her a ticket. This was a long time ago so I have no way of knowing what the ticket was for, or if this friend was telling the truth, fwiw. However, it’s always been my impression that cops can make up some BS charge if they want, and then it’s basically your word vs that of a cop *
- Unless you have a good lawyer
Cops can issue citations, but judges ultimately decide if they are bullshit or not. Cops do not have the authority to make the law up, they only interpret it and enforce it. If you convince a judge that you only got ticketed for a middle-finger and prove it, you are cleared. Sounds like they got the attention of a cop and the cop followed them until they saw them actually break a law.
unless the cop is a smooth-brain dipshit
Believe or not, this is a requirement to become a cop
Believe or not, jail, right away. We have the best patients in the world because of jail.
Let me guess, you’re from the US?
I am not, no. Why?
Ah damn I stand corrected. You didn’t say where you’re from and just explained as if it were universally true everywhere. Kind of a US-Defaultism thing.
These are really bad advices unless you define where you are from because the laws differ in different countries and what police can and cannot do is different.
Nah, Terry Stops have been given additional reach and breadth at every opportunity.
If you are only detained, the officer can pay down the outside of your clothing to check for weapons if there is reason to believe you may be armed. They cannot search you without your consent unless it is incident to lawful arrest. Regardless of the situation, the correct thing to do is to state that you do not consent to any searches or seizures. If they officer actually has the authority to search you, they will. If they search you unlawfully, anything they find is subject to suppression in court.
Deny them consent to search, but do not physically resist if they do. And do not answer questions without a lawyer.
You already messed up talking to the officer in the first place.
Unless you called the cops don’t talk to them. There is literally nothing you can say without possibly incriminating yourself.
Life or death? Talk to save someone otherwise seriously shut up.
Unless you called the cops don’t talk to them.
If you have a problem and call the police, now you have two problems.
I tend to agree, but I have had a few times in my life I have. Obvious drunk driver, guy beating up his girlfriend, and two brothers shooting at each other in the trailer park.
