idk why I kinda cringe every time…

  • emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Super cliche yes, cringe no.

    It’s not entirely a bad metaphor or whatever, but it’s certainly tired. It’s also a bit misleading. Being good at chess isn’t a really a sign of high intelligence generally, it just means you’re good at chess.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Chess is about memorization of moves and thinking ahead to plan for what your opponent may do.

      Intelligence can be partly defined by those talents, without them, you won’t be near the top.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Very partly, since it’s mostly practice and memorisation. It sounds like more basic, intrinsic kinds, like creativity and on-the-fly analysis, don’t enter into it nearly as much. Uneven pairings are fait accompli.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Come to think of it, I’m not sure if any multiplayer game stays that rich at high levels. Opponents are too unpredictable and do too much stuff; it’s usually more about keeping up with the meta.

      Edit: Hell, real life is kind of like that. Maybe fictional chess is just unrealistic the same way as the story.