This is something tradesmen have said for a very long time. I think the original meaning has been lost online.
“It’s not stupid if it works” is basically a tacit admission that something stupid is happening, we all agree that it’s stupid, and we also kind of all know that there is a better way, but for some reason we’re not doing that.
Usually it feels like the stupid thing we’re about to do is the best option available to us.
As a trademan, an addition: it’s usally used in a situation that needed a quick fix, and only needs to hold together for a short period. Usally this the short period gets extended because “it’s still working”.
Not at all. “The purpose of a system is what is does” is a phrase that makes it clear that in a system where a lot of people work in, “purpose” is a useless concept and should never be used to tell if it’s a good or a bad system.
It’s an entirely political view of a system, and has no relation to the implementation being stupid or not.
It’s not stupid if it works.
That’s one of these reddit phrases i’ll never understand. Things can work and be very stupid.
This is something tradesmen have said for a very long time. I think the original meaning has been lost online.
“It’s not stupid if it works” is basically a tacit admission that something stupid is happening, we all agree that it’s stupid, and we also kind of all know that there is a better way, but for some reason we’re not doing that.
Usually it feels like the stupid thing we’re about to do is the best option available to us.
As a trademan, an addition: it’s usally used in a situation that needed a quick fix, and only needs to hold together for a short period. Usally this the short period gets extended because “it’s still working”.
Nothing is as permanent as a temporary fix.
I always liked “it’ll look great from my house”
deleted by creator
Maybe more like this: „If it works as intended, an unconventional approach is justified.“
The purpose of a system is what it does?
Not at all. “The purpose of a system is what is does” is a phrase that makes it clear that in a system where a lot of people work in, “purpose” is a useless concept and should never be used to tell if it’s a good or a bad system.
It’s an entirely political view of a system, and has no relation to the implementation being stupid or not.