Gimp is not exactly on par with programs in other categories, but that doesn’t mean it’s not high quality. It’s good code that is stable, multiplatform, and the project has picked up the pace in recent months. I feel it’s unfair to call the project “not high quality”
Gimp is love, gimp is life :) I have lost track of the years I have relied on that tool always being there when I need a quick edit or to modify some layers.
Plus all the (once valid) criticism about it not being professional is either solved or in the process of being solved (non destructive operations, high bit depth, cmyk…)
GIMP is not high quality. Audacity was sold out. Firefox has also sold out. Apache OpenOffice was what fucked over and led to LibreOffice coming ahead
VLC remains the GOAT
Gimp is not exactly on par with programs in other categories, but that doesn’t mean it’s not high quality. It’s good code that is stable, multiplatform, and the project has picked up the pace in recent months. I feel it’s unfair to call the project “not high quality”
Gimp is love, gimp is life :) I have lost track of the years I have relied on that tool always being there when I need a quick edit or to modify some layers.
Plus all the (once valid) criticism about it not being professional is either solved or in the process of being solved (non destructive operations, high bit depth, cmyk…)
!Too many citation needed
Check other comments through the thread